Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David Weller

Showing results (81-90 of 145) with videos related to

Pageof 15
Sort By:
BMC Primary Care|April 26, 2023
Symptoms and signs of urogenital cancer in primary careKnut Holtedahl, Lars Borgquist, Gé A Donker, et al.
BMC Family Practice|July 2, 2018
Development of an evidence-based brief 'talking' intervention for non-responders to bowel screening for use in primary care: stakeholder interviewsDebbie Cavers, Natalia Calanzani, Sheina Orbell, et al.
BMJ Open|October 14, 2017
Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in ScotlandNatalia Calanzani, Debbie Cavers, Gabriele Vojt, et al.
European Journal of Cancer Care|November 13, 2020
Economic evaluation of GPs' direct access to computed tomography for identification of brain tumoursEdna Keeney, Syed Mohiuddin, Karolis Zienius, et al.
BMC Family Practice|August 9, 2015
Developing a computerised search to help UK General Practices identify more patients for palliative care planning: a feasibility studyBruce Mason, Kirsty Boyd, Scott A Murray, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety|December 28, 2019
Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative studyMarie Kotzur, Colin McCowan, Sara Macdonald, et al.
BMC Health Services Research|September 5, 2018
The Aarhus statement on cancer diagnostic research: turning recommendations into new survey instrumentsDomenica Coxon, Christine Campbell, Fiona M Walter, et al.
BMC Family Practice|October 2, 2020
Barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer diagnosis in New Zealand: a qualitative studyTania Blackmore, Kimberley Norman, Jacquie Kidd, et al.
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health|October 4, 2020
Consumer behavior and exposure to parabens, bisphenols, triclosan, dichlorophenols, and benzophenone-3: Results from a crowdsourced biomonitoring studyRobin E Dodson, Katherine E Boronow, Herbert Susmann, et al.
Health Expectations : an International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy|February 20, 2018
The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help-seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancerKaren N Barnett, David Weller, Steve Smith, et al.
Pageof 15

Showing results (81-90 of 145) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 15
BMC Primary Care|April 26, 2023
Symptoms and signs of urogenital cancer in primary careKnut Holtedahl, Lars Borgquist, Gé A Donker, et al.
BMC Family Practice|July 2, 2018
Development of an evidence-based brief 'talking' intervention for non-responders to bowel screening for use in primary care: stakeholder interviewsDebbie Cavers, Natalia Calanzani, Sheina Orbell, et al.
BMJ Open|October 14, 2017
Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in ScotlandNatalia Calanzani, Debbie Cavers, Gabriele Vojt, et al.
European Journal of Cancer Care|November 13, 2020
Economic evaluation of GPs' direct access to computed tomography for identification of brain tumoursEdna Keeney, Syed Mohiuddin, Karolis Zienius, et al.
BMC Family Practice|August 9, 2015
Developing a computerised search to help UK General Practices identify more patients for palliative care planning: a feasibility studyBruce Mason, Kirsty Boyd, Scott A Murray, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety|December 28, 2019
Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative studyMarie Kotzur, Colin McCowan, Sara Macdonald, et al.
BMC Health Services Research|September 5, 2018
The Aarhus statement on cancer diagnostic research: turning recommendations into new survey instrumentsDomenica Coxon, Christine Campbell, Fiona M Walter, et al.
BMC Family Practice|October 2, 2020
Barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer diagnosis in New Zealand: a qualitative studyTania Blackmore, Kimberley Norman, Jacquie Kidd, et al.
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health|October 4, 2020
Consumer behavior and exposure to parabens, bisphenols, triclosan, dichlorophenols, and benzophenone-3: Results from a crowdsourced biomonitoring studyRobin E Dodson, Katherine E Boronow, Herbert Susmann, et al.
Health Expectations : an International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy|February 20, 2018
The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help-seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancerKaren N Barnett, David Weller, Steve Smith, et al.
Pageof 15