Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Domagoj Coric

Showing results (81-90 of 162) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
Spine|February 26, 2020
Outcomes and Complications With Age in Spondylolisthesis: An Evaluation of the Elderly From the Quality Outcomes DatabaseMichael Karsy, Andrew K Chan, Praveen V Mummaneni, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|January 2, 2018
Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAnthony L Asher, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Praveen V Mummaneni, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|May 3, 2019
Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes DatabasePraveen V Mummaneni, Mohamad Bydon, Mohammed Ali Alvi, et al.
Neurosurgery|December 13, 2018
Obese Patients Benefit, but do not Fare as Well as Nonobese Patients, Following Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|January 22, 2026
What factors predict the best outcomes for older patients operated on for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis? A machine learning analysis from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseEunice Yang, Praveen V Mummaneni, Dean Chou, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|August 29, 2025
Five-year follow-up after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: are there any differences in outcomes?Andrew K Chan, Vardhaan S Ambati, Pavan Upadhyayula, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|July 28, 2022
Determining the time frame of maximum clinical improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy when stratified by preoperative myelopathy severity: a cervical Quality Outcomes Database studyConnor Berlin, Alexandria C Marino, Praveen V Mummaneni, et al.
Neurosurgery|May 16, 2020
A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Neurosurgery|June 5, 2020
Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar SpondylolisthesisAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|December 15, 2018
Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (81-90 of 162) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
Spine|February 26, 2020
Outcomes and Complications With Age in Spondylolisthesis: An Evaluation of the Elderly From the Quality Outcomes DatabaseMichael Karsy, Andrew K Chan, Praveen V Mummaneni, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|January 2, 2018
Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAnthony L Asher, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Praveen V Mummaneni, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|May 3, 2019
Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes DatabasePraveen V Mummaneni, Mohamad Bydon, Mohammed Ali Alvi, et al.
Neurosurgery|December 13, 2018
Obese Patients Benefit, but do not Fare as Well as Nonobese Patients, Following Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery: An Analysis of the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|January 22, 2026
What factors predict the best outcomes for older patients operated on for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis? A machine learning analysis from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseEunice Yang, Praveen V Mummaneni, Dean Chou, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|August 29, 2025
Five-year follow-up after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: are there any differences in outcomes?Andrew K Chan, Vardhaan S Ambati, Pavan Upadhyayula, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|July 28, 2022
Determining the time frame of maximum clinical improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy when stratified by preoperative myelopathy severity: a cervical Quality Outcomes Database studyConnor Berlin, Alexandria C Marino, Praveen V Mummaneni, et al.
Neurosurgery|May 16, 2020
A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Neurosurgery|June 5, 2020
Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar SpondylolisthesisAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|December 15, 2018
Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Pageof 17