Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Douglas Altman

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|April 24, 2012
Predicting the risk of chronic kidney disease in the UK: an evaluation of QKidney® scores using a primary care databaseGary Collins, Douglas Altman
Explore (New York, N.Y.)|June 24, 2006
The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001David Moher, Kenneth F Schulz, Douglas Altman, et al.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy|February 2, 2002
Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practiceJulian Higgins, Simon Thompson, Jonathan Deeks, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|June 12, 2002
Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trialDouglas Altman, Guillermo Carroli, Lelia Duley, et al.
European Journal of Clinical Investigation|February 19, 2020
Completeness of reporting of case reports in high-impact medical journalsJosé A Calvache, Maira Vera-Montoya, Darío Ordoñez, et al.
BMJ Open|April 24, 2016
Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJJennifer Weston, Kerry Dwan, Douglas Altman, et al.
Endoscopy|July 22, 2016
Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathologyAndrew A Plumb, Claire Nickerson, Katherine Wooldrage, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|June 2, 2019
Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-reviewMarta Vilaró, Jordi Cortés, Albert Selva-O'Callaghan, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|October 30, 2019
Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA<sup>2</sup> five-stage study, including a workshopJonathan A Cook, Steven A Julious, William Sones, et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research|May 17, 2019
Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkersGowri Gopalakrishna, Miranda Langendam, Rob Scholten, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|April 24, 2012
Predicting the risk of chronic kidney disease in the UK: an evaluation of QKidney® scores using a primary care databaseGary Collins, Douglas Altman
Explore (New York, N.Y.)|June 24, 2006
The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001David Moher, Kenneth F Schulz, Douglas Altman, et al.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy|February 2, 2002
Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practiceJulian Higgins, Simon Thompson, Jonathan Deeks, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|June 12, 2002
Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trialDouglas Altman, Guillermo Carroli, Lelia Duley, et al.
European Journal of Clinical Investigation|February 19, 2020
Completeness of reporting of case reports in high-impact medical journalsJosé A Calvache, Maira Vera-Montoya, Darío Ordoñez, et al.
BMJ Open|April 24, 2016
Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJJennifer Weston, Kerry Dwan, Douglas Altman, et al.
Endoscopy|July 22, 2016
Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathologyAndrew A Plumb, Claire Nickerson, Katherine Wooldrage, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|June 2, 2019
Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-reviewMarta Vilaró, Jordi Cortés, Albert Selva-O'Callaghan, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|October 30, 2019
Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA<sup>2</sup> five-stage study, including a workshopJonathan A Cook, Steven A Julious, William Sones, et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research|May 17, 2019
Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkersGowri Gopalakrishna, Miranda Langendam, Rob Scholten, et al.
Pageof 1