Showing results (161-170 of 952) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 96
Systematic Reviews|May 17, 2012
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes senseLesley Stewart, David Moher, Paul ShekellePlos One|May 2, 2024
The reporting quality and spin of randomized controlled trials of endometriosis pain: Methodological study based on CONSORT extension on abstractsHoda Shirafkan, David Moher, Parvaneh MirabiAccountability in Research|January 8, 2025
Publisher and journal reciprocity for peer review: Not so muchDavid Moher, Anna Catharina Vieira ArmondAccountability in Research|July 1, 2021
What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analysesDaniele Fanelli, Julie Wong, David MoherBMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|January 11, 2013
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trialsAn-Wen Chan, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Peter C Gøtzsche, et al.Annals of Internal Medicine|January 4, 2012
Distinguishing case series from cohort studiesOlaf M Dekkers, Matthias Egger, Douglas G Altman, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 14, 2010
Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessedAgnes Dechartres, Pierre Charles, Sally Hopewell, et al.BMC Medicine|April 1, 2010
Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a reviewSusan Mallett, Patrick Royston, Susan Dutton, et al.Trials|February 2, 2010
Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewersIain Hrynaszkiewicz, Melissa L Norton, Andrew J Vickers, et al.BMC Medicine|April 1, 2010
Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a reviewSusan Mallett, Patrick Royston, Rachel Waters, et al.Pageof 96