Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

E H Berger

Showing results (1-10 of 52) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Occupational Health Nursing|November 1, 1983
The Hearing Conservation Amendment (Part I)E H Berger
Occupational Health Nursing|January 1, 1980
The effects of hearing protectors on auditory communicationsE H Berger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|December 1, 1981
Re-examination of the low-frequency (50-1000 Hz) normal threshold of hearing in free and diffuse sound fieldsE H Berger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|November 1, 1985
Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level?E H Berger
Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.)|November 1, 2000
Dual protectionE H Berger
Occupational Health Nursing|December 1, 1979
Single number measures of hearing protector noise reductionE H Berger
Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.)|May 1, 1984
Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffsE H Berger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|June 1, 1986
Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devicesE H Berger
Occupational Health Nursing|August 1, 1979
Single number measures of hearing protector noise reductionE H Berger
Forensic Science International. Synergy|June 16, 2025
Finally a really forensic worldwide standard: ISO 21043 <i>Forensic sciences</i>, Part 4, InterpretationCharles E H Berger
Pageof 6

Showing results (1-10 of 52) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Occupational Health Nursing|November 1, 1983
The Hearing Conservation Amendment (Part I)E H Berger
Occupational Health Nursing|January 1, 1980
The effects of hearing protectors on auditory communicationsE H Berger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|December 1, 1981
Re-examination of the low-frequency (50-1000 Hz) normal threshold of hearing in free and diffuse sound fieldsE H Berger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|November 1, 1985
Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level?E H Berger
Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.)|November 1, 2000
Dual protectionE H Berger
Occupational Health Nursing|December 1, 1979
Single number measures of hearing protector noise reductionE H Berger
Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.)|May 1, 1984
Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffsE H Berger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|June 1, 1986
Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devicesE H Berger
Occupational Health Nursing|August 1, 1979
Single number measures of hearing protector noise reductionE H Berger
Forensic Science International. Synergy|June 16, 2025
Finally a really forensic worldwide standard: ISO 21043 <i>Forensic sciences</i>, Part 4, InterpretationCharles E H Berger
Pageof 6