Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (41-50 of 382) with videos related to
Page
of 39
Sort By:
Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)
|
March 8, 2005
An allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article concerning the effects of DIMP on mink
Edward J Calabrese
Human & Experimental Toxicology
|
July 12, 2005
Should hormesis be the default model in risk assessment?
Edward J Calabrese
EMBO Reports
|
October 2, 2004
Hormesis: a revolution in toxicology, risk assessment and medicine
Edward J Calabrese
Archives of Toxicology
|
February 24, 2009
Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted
Edward J Calabrese
Nonlinearity in Biology, Toxicology, Medicine
|
March 31, 2009
The maturing of hormesis as a credible dose-response model
Edward J Calabrese
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
|
August 19, 2008
Pain and u-shaped dose responses: occurrence, mechanisms, and clinical implications
Edward J Calabrese
Toxicological Sciences : an Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology
|
December 15, 2011
Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science
Edward J Calabrese
Human & Experimental Toxicology
|
July 4, 2013
X-Ray treatment of carbuncles and furuncles (boils): a historical assessment
Edward J Calabrese
Archives of Toxicology
|
December 3, 2013
Response to Letter of Ralph J Cicerone and Kevin Crowley regarding "How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response." [DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6, Review Article]
Edward J Calabrese
Dose-Response : a Publication of International Hormesis Society
|
January 8, 2016
Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment
Edward J Calabrese
Page
of 39
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (41-50 of 382) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 39
Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)
|
March 8, 2005
An allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article concerning the effects of DIMP on mink
Edward J Calabrese
Human & Experimental Toxicology
|
July 12, 2005
Should hormesis be the default model in risk assessment?
Edward J Calabrese
EMBO Reports
|
October 2, 2004
Hormesis: a revolution in toxicology, risk assessment and medicine
Edward J Calabrese
Archives of Toxicology
|
February 24, 2009
Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted
Edward J Calabrese
Nonlinearity in Biology, Toxicology, Medicine
|
March 31, 2009
The maturing of hormesis as a credible dose-response model
Edward J Calabrese
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
|
August 19, 2008
Pain and u-shaped dose responses: occurrence, mechanisms, and clinical implications
Edward J Calabrese
Toxicological Sciences : an Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology
|
December 15, 2011
Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science
Edward J Calabrese
Human & Experimental Toxicology
|
July 4, 2013
X-Ray treatment of carbuncles and furuncles (boils): a historical assessment
Edward J Calabrese
Archives of Toxicology
|
December 3, 2013
Response to Letter of Ralph J Cicerone and Kevin Crowley regarding "How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response." [DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6, Review Article]
Edward J Calabrese
Dose-Response : a Publication of International Hormesis Society
|
January 8, 2016
Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment
Edward J Calabrese
Page
of 39