Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Elodia B Cole

Showing results (11-20 of 21) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Academic Radiology|September 19, 2006
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic populationBo Kyoung Seo, Etta D Pisano, Cherie M Kuzmiak, et al.
BMC Medical Imaging|June 11, 2020
Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted imagesAlan I Penn, Milica Medved, Vandana Dialani, et al.
Medical Physics|November 11, 2005
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantomsCherie M Kuzmiak, Etta D Pisano, Elodia B Cole, et al.
Academic Radiology|May 4, 2005
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performanceElodia B Cole, Etta D Pisano, Donglin Zeng, et al.
Radiology|March 29, 2008
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader studyR Edward Hendrick, Elodia B Cole, Etta D Pisano, et al.
Radiology|April 1, 2009
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammographyRobert M Nishikawa, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Constantine Gatsonis, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 24, 2012
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening TrialElodia B Cole, Zheng Zhang, Helga S Marques, et al.
Radiology|May 9, 2002
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film displayEtta D Pisano, Elodia B Cole, Emily O Kistner, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|April 5, 2017
Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer RiskCelia Byrne, Giske Ursin, Christopher F Martin, et al.
Radiology|January 4, 2003
Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion typeElodia B Cole, Etta D Pisano, Emily O Kistner, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 21) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Academic Radiology|September 19, 2006
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic populationBo Kyoung Seo, Etta D Pisano, Cherie M Kuzmiak, et al.
BMC Medical Imaging|June 11, 2020
Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted imagesAlan I Penn, Milica Medved, Vandana Dialani, et al.
Medical Physics|November 11, 2005
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantomsCherie M Kuzmiak, Etta D Pisano, Elodia B Cole, et al.
Academic Radiology|May 4, 2005
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performanceElodia B Cole, Etta D Pisano, Donglin Zeng, et al.
Radiology|March 29, 2008
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader studyR Edward Hendrick, Elodia B Cole, Etta D Pisano, et al.
Radiology|April 1, 2009
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammographyRobert M Nishikawa, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Constantine Gatsonis, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 24, 2012
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening TrialElodia B Cole, Zheng Zhang, Helga S Marques, et al.
Radiology|May 9, 2002
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film displayEtta D Pisano, Elodia B Cole, Emily O Kistner, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|April 5, 2017
Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer RiskCelia Byrne, Giske Ursin, Christopher F Martin, et al.
Radiology|January 4, 2003
Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion typeElodia B Cole, Etta D Pisano, Emily O Kistner, et al.
Pageof 3