Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Emily F Conant

Showing results (61-70 of 154) with videos related to

Pageof 16
Sort By:
JAMA Oncology|February 20, 2016
Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer ScreeningElizabeth S McDonald, Andrew Oustimov, Susan P Weinstein, et al.
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology|May 7, 2023
Pervasiveness of Open Journal Invitations Across Radiology SpecialtiesGolnoosh Ansari, Majid Khan, Susan P Weinstein, et al.
Science Translational Medicine|May 11, 2022
A risk model for digital breast tomosynthesis to predict breast cancer and guide clinical careMikael Eriksson, Stamatia Destounis, Kamila Czene, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|November 4, 2009
Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort studySusan P Weinstein, A Russell Localio, Emily F Conant, et al.
Medical Physics|July 3, 2015
Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessmentYuanjie Zheng, Brad M Keller, Shonket Ray, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 27, 2015
Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast TomosynthesisElizabeth S McDonald, Anne Marie McCarthy, Amana L Akhtar, et al.
Radiology|May 16, 2019
Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ImagesKatrina E Korhonen, Emily F Conant, Eric A Cohen, et al.
Radiology|March 23, 2016
The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006Lin Chen, Shonket Ray, Brad M Keller, et al.
Medical Physics|November 4, 2016
Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representationsAimilia Gastounioti, Andrew Oustimov, Brad M Keller, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|August 3, 2021
Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes among Black women undergoing screening mammographyTara M Friebel-Klingner, Sarah Ehsan, Emily F Conant, et al.
Pageof 16

Showing results (61-70 of 154) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 16
JAMA Oncology|February 20, 2016
Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer ScreeningElizabeth S McDonald, Andrew Oustimov, Susan P Weinstein, et al.
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology|May 7, 2023
Pervasiveness of Open Journal Invitations Across Radiology SpecialtiesGolnoosh Ansari, Majid Khan, Susan P Weinstein, et al.
Science Translational Medicine|May 11, 2022
A risk model for digital breast tomosynthesis to predict breast cancer and guide clinical careMikael Eriksson, Stamatia Destounis, Kamila Czene, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|November 4, 2009
Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort studySusan P Weinstein, A Russell Localio, Emily F Conant, et al.
Medical Physics|July 3, 2015
Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessmentYuanjie Zheng, Brad M Keller, Shonket Ray, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 27, 2015
Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast TomosynthesisElizabeth S McDonald, Anne Marie McCarthy, Amana L Akhtar, et al.
Radiology|May 16, 2019
Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ImagesKatrina E Korhonen, Emily F Conant, Eric A Cohen, et al.
Radiology|March 23, 2016
The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006Lin Chen, Shonket Ray, Brad M Keller, et al.
Medical Physics|November 4, 2016
Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representationsAimilia Gastounioti, Andrew Oustimov, Brad M Keller, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|August 3, 2021
Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes among Black women undergoing screening mammographyTara M Friebel-Klingner, Sarah Ehsan, Emily F Conant, et al.
Pageof 16