Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Erich D Smith

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Forensic Science International. Synergy|March 4, 2022
Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Stanley J Bajic
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 21, 2023
Authors' response to Gutierrez et al Commentary onKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|October 11, 2023
Authors' responseKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|February 14, 2025
The influence of perceived difficulty, availability of marks, and examination time on the conclusions of firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|July 2, 2023
Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|October 1, 2022
Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 21, 2023
Authors' response to Scurich et al Commentary onKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Forensic Science International|October 20, 2023
Automated interpretation of comparison scores for firearm toolmarks on cartridge case primersMartin Baiker-Sørensen, Ivo Alberink, Laura B Granell, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Forensic Science International. Synergy|March 4, 2022
Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Stanley J Bajic
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 21, 2023
Authors' response to Gutierrez et al Commentary onKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|October 11, 2023
Authors' responseKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|February 14, 2025
The influence of perceived difficulty, availability of marks, and examination time on the conclusions of firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|July 2, 2023
Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|October 1, 2022
Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examinersKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 21, 2023
Authors' response to Scurich et al Commentary onKeith L Monson, Erich D Smith, Eugene M Peters
Forensic Science International|October 20, 2023
Automated interpretation of comparison scores for firearm toolmarks on cartridge case primersMartin Baiker-Sørensen, Ivo Alberink, Laura B Granell, et al.
Pageof 1