Showing results (21-30 of 34) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 4
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis|August 1, 1995
Cost comparison between two modes of Palmaz Schatz coronary stent implantation: transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath-protected stent techniqueF Kiemeneij, J Hofland, G J Laarman, et al.Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions|December 18, 2001
Measurement of radial artery spasm using an automatic pullback deviceF Kiemeneij, B U Vajifdar, S C Eccleshall, et al.Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions|April 4, 2001
Direct coronary stent implantation: safety, feasibility, and predictors of success of the strategy of direct coronary stent implantationG Laarman, T S Muthusamy, H Swart, et al.British Heart Journal|July 1, 1994
A pilot study of coronary angioplasty in outpatientsG J Laarman, F Kiemeneij, L R van der Wieken, et al.Netherlands Heart Journal : Monthly Journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation|February 20, 2015
Safety, efficacy and costs associated with direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation: A randomised controlled trialA IJsselmuiden, P W Serruys, G J Tangelder, et al.Circulation|November 17, 1998
Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk patients: the multicenter aspirin and ticlopidine trial after intracoronary stenting (MATTIS)P Urban, C Macaya, H J Rupprecht, et al.The New England Journal of Medicine|August 25, 1994
A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study GroupP W Serruys, P de Jaegere, F Kiemeneij, et al.European Heart Journal|March 14, 2003
Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trialA J J IJsselmuiden, P W Serruys, A Scholte, et al.International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions|September 10, 2003
Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomesA J J Ijsselmuiden, G J Tangelder, J M Cotton, et al.Journal of the American College of Cardiology|October 8, 1997
First international new intravascular rigid-flex endovascular stent study (FINESS): clinical and angiographic results after elective and urgent stent implantation. The FINESS Trial InvestigatorsY Almagor, S Feld, F Kiemeneij, et al.Pageof 4