Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Felix G Rebitschek

Showing results (1-10 of 28) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz|May 20, 2020
[Assessing the quality of digital health services: How can informed decisions be promoted?]Felix G Rebitschek, Gerd Gigerenzer
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe|December 17, 2024
Benefits and harms associated with the use of AI-related algorithmic decision-making systems by healthcare professionals: a systematic reviewChristoph Wilhelm, Anke Steckelberg, Felix G Rebitschek
Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie|September 18, 2020
[Acceptance of assistive robots in the field of nursing and healthcare : Representative data show a clear picture for Germany]Felix G Rebitschek, Gert G Wagner
Systematic Reviews|September 6, 2024
Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients?  : Protocol for a systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-makingChristoph Wilhelm, Anke Steckelberg, Felix G Rebitschek
BMJ Open|November 1, 2024
Do summaries of evidence enable informed decision-making about COVID-19 and influenza vaccination equitably across more and less disadvantaged groups? Study protocol for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial of 'fact boxes' in health and social care in GermanyChristin Ellermann, Nicolai Savaskan, Felix G Rebitschek
Scientific Reports|October 12, 2021
People underestimate the errors made by algorithms for credit scoring and recidivism prediction but accept even fewer errorsFelix G Rebitschek, Gerd Gigerenzer, Gert G Wagner
Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making|February 26, 2019
Effect of Tabular and Icon Fact Box Formats on Comprehension of Benefits and Harms of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized TrialMichelle McDowell, Gerd Gigerenzer, Odette Wegwarth, et al.
Memory & Cognition|February 10, 2016
The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoningFelix G Rebitschek, Josef F Krems, Georg Jahn
Plos One|June 13, 2019
Do cancer risk and benefit-harm ratios influence women's consideration of risk-reducing mastectomy? A scenario-based experiment in five European countriesFelix G Rebitschek, Nora Pashayan, Martin Widschwendter, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|February 28, 2024
When evidence changes: Communicating uncertainty protects against a loss of trustCharlotte Dries, Michelle McDowell, Felix G Rebitschek, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (1-10 of 28) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz|May 20, 2020
[Assessing the quality of digital health services: How can informed decisions be promoted?]Felix G Rebitschek, Gerd Gigerenzer
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe|December 17, 2024
Benefits and harms associated with the use of AI-related algorithmic decision-making systems by healthcare professionals: a systematic reviewChristoph Wilhelm, Anke Steckelberg, Felix G Rebitschek
Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie|September 18, 2020
[Acceptance of assistive robots in the field of nursing and healthcare : Representative data show a clear picture for Germany]Felix G Rebitschek, Gert G Wagner
Systematic Reviews|September 6, 2024
Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients?  : Protocol for a systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-makingChristoph Wilhelm, Anke Steckelberg, Felix G Rebitschek
BMJ Open|November 1, 2024
Do summaries of evidence enable informed decision-making about COVID-19 and influenza vaccination equitably across more and less disadvantaged groups? Study protocol for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial of 'fact boxes' in health and social care in GermanyChristin Ellermann, Nicolai Savaskan, Felix G Rebitschek
Scientific Reports|October 12, 2021
People underestimate the errors made by algorithms for credit scoring and recidivism prediction but accept even fewer errorsFelix G Rebitschek, Gerd Gigerenzer, Gert G Wagner
Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making|February 26, 2019
Effect of Tabular and Icon Fact Box Formats on Comprehension of Benefits and Harms of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized TrialMichelle McDowell, Gerd Gigerenzer, Odette Wegwarth, et al.
Memory & Cognition|February 10, 2016
The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoningFelix G Rebitschek, Josef F Krems, Georg Jahn
Plos One|June 13, 2019
Do cancer risk and benefit-harm ratios influence women's consideration of risk-reducing mastectomy? A scenario-based experiment in five European countriesFelix G Rebitschek, Nora Pashayan, Martin Widschwendter, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|February 28, 2024
When evidence changes: Communicating uncertainty protects against a loss of trustCharlotte Dries, Michelle McDowell, Felix G Rebitschek, et al.
Pageof 3