Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Fiona Fidler

Showing results (1-10 of 44) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Psychological Science|May 3, 2014
Yes, but don't underestimate estimation: reply to Morey, Rouder, Verhagen, and Wagenmakers (2014)Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
Nature Nanotechnology|July 26, 2008
How fast should nanotechnology advance?Bonnie Wintle, Mark Burgman, Fiona Fidler
Behaviour Research and Therapy|January 15, 2008
The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysisCathy Faulkner, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
The Journal of Cell Biology|April 11, 2007
Error bars in experimental biologyGeoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, David L Vaux
EMBO Reports|March 17, 2012
Replicates and repeats--what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental designDavid L Vaux, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
Frontiers in Psychology|May 25, 2011
Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testingMelissa Coulson, Michelle Healey, Fiona Fidler, et al.
Psychological Methods|January 6, 2006
Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error barsSarah Belia, Fiona Fidler, Jennifer Williams, et al.
Ecology and Evolution|July 2, 2020
The role of replication studies in ecologyHannah Fraser, Ashley Barnett, Timothy H Parker, et al.
Elife|November 19, 2020
Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer reviewDaniel G Hamilton, Hannah Fraser, Rink Hoekstra, et al.
Psychological Science|June 10, 2005
Still much to learn about confidence intervals: reply to Rounder and Morey (2005)Fiona Fidler, Neil Thomason, Geoff Cumming, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (1-10 of 44) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Psychological Science|May 3, 2014
Yes, but don't underestimate estimation: reply to Morey, Rouder, Verhagen, and Wagenmakers (2014)Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
Nature Nanotechnology|July 26, 2008
How fast should nanotechnology advance?Bonnie Wintle, Mark Burgman, Fiona Fidler
Behaviour Research and Therapy|January 15, 2008
The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysisCathy Faulkner, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
The Journal of Cell Biology|April 11, 2007
Error bars in experimental biologyGeoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, David L Vaux
EMBO Reports|March 17, 2012
Replicates and repeats--what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental designDavid L Vaux, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
Frontiers in Psychology|May 25, 2011
Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testingMelissa Coulson, Michelle Healey, Fiona Fidler, et al.
Psychological Methods|January 6, 2006
Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error barsSarah Belia, Fiona Fidler, Jennifer Williams, et al.
Ecology and Evolution|July 2, 2020
The role of replication studies in ecologyHannah Fraser, Ashley Barnett, Timothy H Parker, et al.
Elife|November 19, 2020
Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer reviewDaniel G Hamilton, Hannah Fraser, Rink Hoekstra, et al.
Psychological Science|June 10, 2005
Still much to learn about confidence intervals: reply to Rounder and Morey (2005)Fiona Fidler, Neil Thomason, Geoff Cumming, et al.
Pageof 5