Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (1-10 of 29) with videos related to
Page
of 3
Sort By:
Human Reproduction Update
|
June 22, 2024
Reply. The role of endometrial scratching in IVF/ICSI: a critical appraisal of individual participant data meta-analysis
Nienke van Hoogenhuijze, Frank Broekmans
Human Reproduction Update
|
June 22, 2024
Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'?
Nienke Van Hoogenhuijze, Frank Broekmans
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|
January 27, 2005
'Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome'
Ellen Klinkert, Egbert te Velde, Frank Broekmans
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|
April 23, 2022
Insights into ovarian response with a fixed low dose FSH stimulation in an IUI programme: the PRORAILS study
Anouk Rutten, Hanne van Ballegooijen, Frank Broekmans, et al.
Fertility and Sterility
|
April 3, 2009
Hypertensive pregnancy complications in poor and normal responders after in vitro fertilization
Jeroen van Disseldorp, Rene Eijkemans, Bart Fauser, et al.
BMJ Open
|
November 20, 2025
Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis
Emma Preesman, Katja Drechsel, Heleen Crommelin, et al.
Human Reproduction Open
|
March 15, 2021
Reply: Questionable recommendation for LPS for IVF/ICSI in ESHRE guideline 2019: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI
Frank Broekmans, Peter Humaidan, George Lainas, et al.
European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|
March 26, 2019
Evaluation of the Elecsys<sup>®</sup> anti-Müllerian hormone assay for the prediction of hyper-response to controlled ovarian stimulation with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol
Ellen Anckaert, Barbara Denk, Ying He, et al.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online
|
February 15, 2011
Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF
Jeroen van Disseldorp, Lude Franke, Rene Eijkemans, et al.
Fertility and Sterility
|
June 27, 2025
Considering minimal clinically important differences in assisted reproductive technology
Juan Enrique Schwarze, Frank Broekmans, Shiv Gupta, et al.
Page
of 3
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (1-10 of 29) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 3
Human Reproduction Update
|
June 22, 2024
Reply. The role of endometrial scratching in IVF/ICSI: a critical appraisal of individual participant data meta-analysis
Nienke van Hoogenhuijze, Frank Broekmans
Human Reproduction Update
|
June 22, 2024
Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'?
Nienke Van Hoogenhuijze, Frank Broekmans
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|
January 27, 2005
'Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome'
Ellen Klinkert, Egbert te Velde, Frank Broekmans
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|
April 23, 2022
Insights into ovarian response with a fixed low dose FSH stimulation in an IUI programme: the PRORAILS study
Anouk Rutten, Hanne van Ballegooijen, Frank Broekmans, et al.
Fertility and Sterility
|
April 3, 2009
Hypertensive pregnancy complications in poor and normal responders after in vitro fertilization
Jeroen van Disseldorp, Rene Eijkemans, Bart Fauser, et al.
BMJ Open
|
November 20, 2025
Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis
Emma Preesman, Katja Drechsel, Heleen Crommelin, et al.
Human Reproduction Open
|
March 15, 2021
Reply: Questionable recommendation for LPS for IVF/ICSI in ESHRE guideline 2019: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI
Frank Broekmans, Peter Humaidan, George Lainas, et al.
European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|
March 26, 2019
Evaluation of the Elecsys<sup>®</sup> anti-Müllerian hormone assay for the prediction of hyper-response to controlled ovarian stimulation with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol
Ellen Anckaert, Barbara Denk, Ying He, et al.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online
|
February 15, 2011
Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF
Jeroen van Disseldorp, Lude Franke, Rene Eijkemans, et al.
Fertility and Sterility
|
June 27, 2025
Considering minimal clinically important differences in assisted reproductive technology
Juan Enrique Schwarze, Frank Broekmans, Shiv Gupta, et al.
Page
of 3