Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

G Altman

Showing results (431-440 of 965) with videos related to

Pageof 97
Sort By:
Plos One|October 30, 2014
Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonographySusan Mallett, Steve Halligan, Gary S Collins, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|January 21, 2010
Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation studyAndrea Marshall, Douglas G Altman, Patrick Royston, et al.
Circulation|September 1, 1983
Circadian variation of blood pressure in autonomic failureS Mann, D G Altman, E B Raftery, et al.
Open Medicine : a Peer-Reviewed, Independent, Open-Access Journal|May 24, 2011
EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health researchDouglas G Altman, Iveta Simera, John Hoey, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|June 9, 2009
Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practiceKarel G M Moons, Douglas G Altman, Yvonne Vergouwe, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|January 4, 2012
Distinguishing case series from cohort studiesOlaf M Dekkers, Matthias Egger, Douglas G Altman, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 14, 2010
Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessedAgnes Dechartres, Pierre Charles, Sally Hopewell, et al.
BMC Medicine|April 1, 2010
Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a reviewSusan Mallett, Patrick Royston, Susan Dutton, et al.
JAMA|September 3, 2009
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trialsSylvain Mathieu, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, et al.
Systematic Reviews|September 25, 2013
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane CollaborationLucy Turner, Isabelle Boutron, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, et al.
Pageof 97

Showing results (431-440 of 965) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 97
Plos One|October 30, 2014
Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonographySusan Mallett, Steve Halligan, Gary S Collins, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|January 21, 2010
Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation studyAndrea Marshall, Douglas G Altman, Patrick Royston, et al.
Circulation|September 1, 1983
Circadian variation of blood pressure in autonomic failureS Mann, D G Altman, E B Raftery, et al.
Open Medicine : a Peer-Reviewed, Independent, Open-Access Journal|May 24, 2011
EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health researchDouglas G Altman, Iveta Simera, John Hoey, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|June 9, 2009
Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practiceKarel G M Moons, Douglas G Altman, Yvonne Vergouwe, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|January 4, 2012
Distinguishing case series from cohort studiesOlaf M Dekkers, Matthias Egger, Douglas G Altman, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 14, 2010
Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessedAgnes Dechartres, Pierre Charles, Sally Hopewell, et al.
BMC Medicine|April 1, 2010
Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a reviewSusan Mallett, Patrick Royston, Susan Dutton, et al.
JAMA|September 3, 2009
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trialsSylvain Mathieu, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, et al.
Systematic Reviews|September 25, 2013
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane CollaborationLucy Turner, Isabelle Boutron, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, et al.
Pageof 97