Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Geoff Cumming

Showing results (11-20 of 38) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
International Journal of Psychology : Journal International De Psychologie|April 29, 2024
From significance testing to estimation and Open Science: How esci can helpRobert Calin-Jageman, Geoff Cumming
Frontiers in Psychology|March 13, 2018
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Students' Intuitions When Interpreting CIsPav Kalinowski, Jerry Lai, Geoff Cumming
Eneuro|August 28, 2019
Estimation for Better Inference in NeuroscienceRobert J Calin-Jageman, Geoff Cumming
Behaviour Research and Therapy|January 15, 2008
The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysisCathy Faulkner, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
The American Statistician|November 26, 2019
The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else is KnownRobert J Calin-Jageman, Geoff Cumming
EMBO Reports|March 17, 2012
Replicates and repeats--what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental designDavid L Vaux, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale|August 3, 2004
Cultivating expertise in informal reasoningTim van Gelder, Melanie Bissett, Geoff Cumming
The Journal of Cell Biology|April 11, 2007
Error bars in experimental biologyGeoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, David L Vaux
Frontiers in Psychology|May 25, 2011
Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testingMelissa Coulson, Michelle Healey, Fiona Fidler, et al.
Psychological Methods|January 6, 2006
Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error barsSarah Belia, Fiona Fidler, Jennifer Williams, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (11-20 of 38) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
International Journal of Psychology : Journal International De Psychologie|April 29, 2024
From significance testing to estimation and Open Science: How esci can helpRobert Calin-Jageman, Geoff Cumming
Frontiers in Psychology|March 13, 2018
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Students' Intuitions When Interpreting CIsPav Kalinowski, Jerry Lai, Geoff Cumming
Eneuro|August 28, 2019
Estimation for Better Inference in NeuroscienceRobert J Calin-Jageman, Geoff Cumming
Behaviour Research and Therapy|January 15, 2008
The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysisCathy Faulkner, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
The American Statistician|November 26, 2019
The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else is KnownRobert J Calin-Jageman, Geoff Cumming
EMBO Reports|March 17, 2012
Replicates and repeats--what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental designDavid L Vaux, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale|August 3, 2004
Cultivating expertise in informal reasoningTim van Gelder, Melanie Bissett, Geoff Cumming
The Journal of Cell Biology|April 11, 2007
Error bars in experimental biologyGeoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, David L Vaux
Frontiers in Psychology|May 25, 2011
Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testingMelissa Coulson, Michelle Healey, Fiona Fidler, et al.
Psychological Methods|January 6, 2006
Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error barsSarah Belia, Fiona Fidler, Jennifer Williams, et al.
Pageof 4