Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Gulraj S Matharu

Showing results (11-20 of 78) with videos related to

Pageof 8
Sort By:
Hip International : the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy|June 28, 2014
Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomesGulraj S Matharu, Paul B Pynsent, David J Dunlop
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|March 13, 2018
Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched StudyGulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, David W Murray, et al.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume|July 6, 2018
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and WalesGulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, David W Murray, et al.
The Knee|March 3, 2020
New surgical instrumentation reduces the revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement: A propensity score matched comparison of 15,906 knees from the National Joint RegistryHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty|December 3, 2014
Failure of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing prosthesisGulraj S Matharu, Joseph Daniel, Hena Ziaee, et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders|December 14, 2016
Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManGulraj S Matharu, Hemant G Pandit, David W Murray, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|February 15, 2018
Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified?Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, Hemant G Pandit, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica|August 10, 2013
Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcomeCurtis A Robb, Gulraj S Matharu, Khalid Baloch, et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty|August 11, 2020
The Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of the Lateral Domed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|May 19, 2020
A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Pageof 8

Showing results (11-20 of 78) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 8
Hip International : the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy|June 28, 2014
Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomesGulraj S Matharu, Paul B Pynsent, David J Dunlop
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|March 13, 2018
Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched StudyGulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, David W Murray, et al.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume|July 6, 2018
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and WalesGulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, David W Murray, et al.
The Knee|March 3, 2020
New surgical instrumentation reduces the revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement: A propensity score matched comparison of 15,906 knees from the National Joint RegistryHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty|December 3, 2014
Failure of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing prosthesisGulraj S Matharu, Joseph Daniel, Hena Ziaee, et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders|December 14, 2016
Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManGulraj S Matharu, Hemant G Pandit, David W Murray, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|February 15, 2018
Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified?Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, Hemant G Pandit, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica|August 10, 2013
Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcomeCurtis A Robb, Gulraj S Matharu, Khalid Baloch, et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty|August 11, 2020
The Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of the Lateral Domed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|May 19, 2020
A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Pageof 8