Showing results (691-700 of 861) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 87
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne|July 13, 2016
Predictors of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studiesLi Wang, Gordon H Guyatt, Sean A Kennedy, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 2, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectnessGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, et al.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne|August 12, 2020
Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analysesStefan Schandelmaier, Matthias Briel, Ravi Varadhan, et al.Clinical Epidemiology|June 18, 2020
Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological SurveyLara A Kahale, Assem M Khamis, Batoul Diab, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 23, 2017
GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidenceGordon H Guyatt, Shanil Ebrahim, Pablo Alonso-Coello, et al.Annals of Internal Medicine|July 23, 2014
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysisBram Rochwerg, Waleed Alhazzani, Anees Sindi, et al.BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|August 28, 2020
Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation studyLara A Kahale, Assem M Khamis, Batoul Diab, et al.JAMA|November 19, 2002
Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysisP J Devereaux, Holger J Schünemann, Nikila Ravindran, et al.JAMA Internal Medicine|June 25, 2019
Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening Choice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisJarno M Riikonen, Gordon H Guyatt, Tuomas P Kilpeläinen, et al.BMC Health Services Research|March 25, 2005
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new systemDavid Atkins, Peter A Briss, Martin Eccles, et al.Pageof 87