Hollie S Jones - JoVE Visualize

Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Filters

Hollie S Jones

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Pageof 1

Sort By:

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research|March 29, 2018

Presence of Spotters Improves Bench Press Performance: A Deception StudyAndrew Sheridan, David C Marchant, Emily L Williams, et al.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise|December 5, 2013

Deception studies manipulating centrally acting performance modifiers: a reviewEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, Sandy Sparks, et al.

Frontiers in Physiology|October 7, 2017

Editorial: Regulation of Endurance Performance: New FrontiersFlorentina J Hettinga, Andrew Renfree, Benjamin Pageaux, et al.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport|August 3, 2014

Competitor presence reduces internal attentional focus and improves 16.1km cycling time trial performanceEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, et al.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise|August 15, 2014

Distance-dependent association of affect with pacing strategy in cycling time trialsHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David Marchant, et al.

Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)|September 5, 2013

Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a reviewHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, Craig A Bridge, et al.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise|May 14, 2015

Altered Psychological Responses to Different Magnitudes of Deception during CyclingEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, et al.

Frontiers in Physiology|October 8, 2016

Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive FeedbackHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David Marchant, et al.

Frontiers in Physiology|November 29, 2016

Deceptive Manipulation of Competitive Starting Strategies Influences Subsequent Pacing, Physiological Status, and Perceptual Responses during Cycling Time TrialsEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, et al.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport|January 5, 2016

Deception has no acute or residual effect on cycling time trial performance but negatively effects perceptual responsesHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David C Marchant, et al.

Pageof 1

Search research articles

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Sort By:

Pageof 1

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research|March 29, 2018

Presence of Spotters Improves Bench Press Performance: A Deception StudyAndrew Sheridan, David C Marchant, Emily L Williams, et al.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise|December 5, 2013

Deception studies manipulating centrally acting performance modifiers: a reviewEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, Sandy Sparks, et al.

Frontiers in Physiology|October 7, 2017

Editorial: Regulation of Endurance Performance: New FrontiersFlorentina J Hettinga, Andrew Renfree, Benjamin Pageaux, et al.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport|August 3, 2014

Competitor presence reduces internal attentional focus and improves 16.1km cycling time trial performanceEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, et al.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise|August 15, 2014

Distance-dependent association of affect with pacing strategy in cycling time trialsHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David Marchant, et al.

Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)|September 5, 2013

Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a reviewHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, Craig A Bridge, et al.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise|May 14, 2015

Altered Psychological Responses to Different Magnitudes of Deception during CyclingEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, et al.

Frontiers in Physiology|October 8, 2016

Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive FeedbackHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David Marchant, et al.

Frontiers in Physiology|November 29, 2016

Deceptive Manipulation of Competitive Starting Strategies Influences Subsequent Pacing, Physiological Status, and Perceptual Responses during Cycling Time TrialsEmily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, et al.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport|January 5, 2016

Deception has no acute or residual effect on cycling time trial performance but negatively effects perceptual responsesHollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David C Marchant, et al.

Pageof 1