Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

I Chalmers

Showing results (1-10 of 228) with videos related to

Pageof 23
Sort By:
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 1, 2000
Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research. Biomedical funding decisions should be auditedI Chalmers
International Journal of Epidemiology|November 2, 2001
Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experimentsI Chalmers
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)|January 1, 1983
Scientific inquiry and authoritarianism in perinatal care and educationI Chalmers
Midwives Chronicle|January 1, 1993
Effective care in midwifery: research, the professions and the publicI Chalmers
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|July 1, 1997
Assembling comparison groups to assess the effects of health careI Chalmers
The British Journal of Psychiatry : the Journal of Mental Science|January 6, 2000
A symbiosis of paper and electronic publishing, serving the interests of the journal's readersI Chalmers
Pediatrics|September 1, 1976
Commentaries: British debate on obstetric practiceI Chalmers
Lancet (London, England)|January 19, 1980
Better perinatal health. ShanghaiI Chalmers
The Medico-Legal Journal|January 1, 1994
Why are opinions about the effects of health care so often wrong?I Chalmers
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)|July 27, 1985
Short, Black, Baird, Himsworth, and social class differences in fetal and neonatal mortality ratesI Chalmers
Pageof 23

Showing results (1-10 of 228) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 23
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 1, 2000
Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research. Biomedical funding decisions should be auditedI Chalmers
International Journal of Epidemiology|November 2, 2001
Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experimentsI Chalmers
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)|January 1, 1983
Scientific inquiry and authoritarianism in perinatal care and educationI Chalmers
Midwives Chronicle|January 1, 1993
Effective care in midwifery: research, the professions and the publicI Chalmers
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|July 1, 1997
Assembling comparison groups to assess the effects of health careI Chalmers
The British Journal of Psychiatry : the Journal of Mental Science|January 6, 2000
A symbiosis of paper and electronic publishing, serving the interests of the journal's readersI Chalmers
Pediatrics|September 1, 1976
Commentaries: British debate on obstetric practiceI Chalmers
Lancet (London, England)|January 19, 1980
Better perinatal health. ShanghaiI Chalmers
The Medico-Legal Journal|January 1, 1994
Why are opinions about the effects of health care so often wrong?I Chalmers
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)|July 27, 1985
Short, Black, Baird, Himsworth, and social class differences in fetal and neonatal mortality ratesI Chalmers
Pageof 23