Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Ibrahim Danad

Showing results (121-130 of 148) with videos related to

Pageof 15
Sort By:
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging|May 13, 2021
Comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance stress T1 mapping and [15O]H2O positron emission tomography in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery diseaseHenk Everaars, Pepijn A van Diemen, P Stefan Biesbroek, et al.
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging|October 9, 2024
Diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prior coronary artery diseaseRoel Hoek, Sonia Borodzicz-Jazdzyk, Pepijn A van Diemen, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|September 30, 2019
Artificial Intelligence for Aortic Pressure Waveform Analysis During Coronary Angiography: Machine Learning for Patient SafetyJames P Howard, Christopher M Cook, Tim P van de Hoef, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging|April 20, 2020
Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial IschemiaPepijn A van Diemen, Roel S Driessen, Rolf A Kooistra, et al.
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging|August 14, 2023
The diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio and perfusion imaging in patients with prior coronary artery diseasePepijn A van Diemen, Ruben W de Winter, Stefan P Schumacher, et al.
Journal of Interventional Cardiology|September 22, 2021
Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow ReservePepijn A van Diemen, Ruben W de Winter, Stefan P Schumacher, et al.
JAMA Cardiology|August 17, 2017
Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow ReserveIbrahim Danad, Pieter G Raijmakers, Roel S Driessen, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging|March 14, 2024
Development and Validation of a Quantitative Coronary CT Angiography Model for Diagnosis of Vessel-Specific Coronary IschemiaNick S Nurmohamed, Ibrahim Danad, Ruurt A Jukema, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|December 23, 2017
Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow MeasurementsChristopher M Cook, Allen Jeremias, Ricardo Petraco, et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography|November 11, 2023
Rationale and design of the CONFIRM2 (Quantitative COroNary CT Angiography Evaluation For Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational, Multicenter Registry) studyAlexander R van Rosendael, Tami Crabtree, Jeroen J Bax, et al.
Pageof 15

Showing results (121-130 of 148) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 15
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging|May 13, 2021
Comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance stress T1 mapping and [15O]H2O positron emission tomography in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery diseaseHenk Everaars, Pepijn A van Diemen, P Stefan Biesbroek, et al.
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging|October 9, 2024
Diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prior coronary artery diseaseRoel Hoek, Sonia Borodzicz-Jazdzyk, Pepijn A van Diemen, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|September 30, 2019
Artificial Intelligence for Aortic Pressure Waveform Analysis During Coronary Angiography: Machine Learning for Patient SafetyJames P Howard, Christopher M Cook, Tim P van de Hoef, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging|April 20, 2020
Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial IschemiaPepijn A van Diemen, Roel S Driessen, Rolf A Kooistra, et al.
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging|August 14, 2023
The diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio and perfusion imaging in patients with prior coronary artery diseasePepijn A van Diemen, Ruben W de Winter, Stefan P Schumacher, et al.
Journal of Interventional Cardiology|September 22, 2021
Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow ReservePepijn A van Diemen, Ruben W de Winter, Stefan P Schumacher, et al.
JAMA Cardiology|August 17, 2017
Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow ReserveIbrahim Danad, Pieter G Raijmakers, Roel S Driessen, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging|March 14, 2024
Development and Validation of a Quantitative Coronary CT Angiography Model for Diagnosis of Vessel-Specific Coronary IschemiaNick S Nurmohamed, Ibrahim Danad, Ruurt A Jukema, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|December 23, 2017
Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow MeasurementsChristopher M Cook, Allen Jeremias, Ricardo Petraco, et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography|November 11, 2023
Rationale and design of the CONFIRM2 (Quantitative COroNary CT Angiography Evaluation For Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational, Multicenter Registry) studyAlexander R van Rosendael, Tami Crabtree, Jeroen J Bax, et al.
Pageof 15