Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Ignacio Neumann

Showing results (111-120 of 143) with videos related to

Pageof 15
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|October 8, 2016
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENTHolger J Schünemann, Wojtek Wiercioch, Jan Brozek, et al.
BMJ Open|October 2, 2015
Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological surveyElie A Akl, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, et al.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes|May 3, 2017
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approachYuan Zhang, Pablo Alonso Coello, Jan Brożek, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 27, 2022
An evaluation of the COVID-19 recommendation map identified diverging clinical and public health guidanceZil H Nasir, Dominik Mertz, Robby Nieuwlaat, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 7, 2022
GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisionsHolger J Schünemann, Ignacio Neumann, Monica Hultcrantz, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 13, 2015
Systematic reviews experience major limitations in reporting absolute effectsPablo Alonso-Coello, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 10, 2023
Equity issues rarely addressed in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations and good practice statements: a cross-sectional studyOmar Dewidar, Mostafa Bondok, Leenah Abdelrazeq, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 25, 2016
Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstractsArnav Agarwal, Bradley C Johnston, Robin W M Vernooij, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|August 30, 2012
Learning from failure--rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study)Benjamin Kasenda, Erik B von Elm, John You, et al.
Systematic Reviews|December 17, 2013
A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocolPablo Alonso-Coello, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, et al.
Pageof 15

Showing results (111-120 of 143) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 15
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|October 8, 2016
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENTHolger J Schünemann, Wojtek Wiercioch, Jan Brozek, et al.
BMJ Open|October 2, 2015
Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological surveyElie A Akl, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, et al.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes|May 3, 2017
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approachYuan Zhang, Pablo Alonso Coello, Jan Brożek, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 27, 2022
An evaluation of the COVID-19 recommendation map identified diverging clinical and public health guidanceZil H Nasir, Dominik Mertz, Robby Nieuwlaat, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 7, 2022
GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisionsHolger J Schünemann, Ignacio Neumann, Monica Hultcrantz, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 13, 2015
Systematic reviews experience major limitations in reporting absolute effectsPablo Alonso-Coello, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 10, 2023
Equity issues rarely addressed in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations and good practice statements: a cross-sectional studyOmar Dewidar, Mostafa Bondok, Leenah Abdelrazeq, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 25, 2016
Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstractsArnav Agarwal, Bradley C Johnston, Robin W M Vernooij, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|August 30, 2012
Learning from failure--rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study)Benjamin Kasenda, Erik B von Elm, John You, et al.
Systematic Reviews|December 17, 2013
A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocolPablo Alonso-Coello, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, et al.
Pageof 15