Showing results (141-150 of 233) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 24
The British Journal of Radiology|September 28, 2019
Can mammogram readers swiftly and effectively learn to interpret first post-contrast acquisition subtracted (FAST) MRI, a type of abbreviated breast MRI?: a single centre data-interpretation studyLyn I Jones, Rebecca Geach, Sam A Harding, et al.Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|June 25, 2021
Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluationChris Stinton, Mary Jordan, Hannah Fraser, et al.BMJ Open|January 20, 2016
Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysisSian Taylor-Phillips, Karoline Freeman, Julia Geppert, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 19, 2025
Potential waste in evidence synthesis for health screening: a scoping review and call for actionSarah Batson, Matthew J Randell, Catherine Bane, et al.BMJ Open|November 9, 2019
Communicating biopsy results from breast screening assessment: current practice in English breast screening centres and staff perspectives of telephoning resultsSian Z Williamson, Rebecca Johnson, Harbinder K Sandhu, et al.BMC Cancer|July 27, 2016
Is monitoring of plasma 5-fluorouracil levels in metastatic / advanced colorectal cancer clinically effective? A systematic reviewKaroline Freeman, Mark P Saunders, Olalekan A Uthman, et al.Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|November 16, 2016
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of use of therapeutic monitoring of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors [LISA-TRACKER® enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, TNF-α-Blocker ELISA kits and Promonitor® ELISA kits] versus standard care in patients with Crohn's disease: systematic reviews and economic modellingKaroline Freeman, Martin Connock, Peter Auguste, et al.Preventive Medicine Reports|January 23, 2019
Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferencesSian Williamson, Jacoby Patterson, Rebecca Crosby, et al.Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|July 2, 2020
Rapid antigen detection and molecular tests for group A streptococcal infections for acute sore throat: systematic reviews and economic evaluationHannah Fraser, Daniel Gallacher, Felix Achana, et al.BMJ Open|June 25, 2013
Evidence-based commissioning in the English NHS: who uses which sources of evidence? A survey 2010/2011Aileen Clarke, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Jacky Swan, et al.Pageof 24