Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Ingvar Andersson

Showing results (21-30 of 38) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
European Radiology|July 22, 2008
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findingsIngvar Andersson, Debra M Ikeda, Sophia Zackrisson, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|September 6, 2012
Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patternsMagnus Dustler, Ingvar Andersson, Håkan Brorson, et al.
European Radiology|January 22, 2017
Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?Magnus Dustler, Daniel Förnvik, Pontus Timberg, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|August 31, 2013
No evidence for shedding of circulating tumor cells to the peripheral venous blood as a result of mammographic breast compressionDaniel Förnvik, Ingvar Andersson, Magnus Dustler, et al.
Academic Radiology|August 21, 2002
Decreasing rate of fatty involution at screening mammographyCaroline E Blane, J Thomas Fitzgerald, Larry D Gruppen, et al.
Bioresource Technology|August 20, 2014
The effect of temperature on the catalytic conversion of Kraft lignin using near-critical waterThi Dieu Huyen Nguyen, Marco Maschietti, Lars-Erik Åmand, et al.
The Lancet. Oncology|August 4, 2023
Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy studyKristina Lång, Viktoria Josefsson, Anna-Maria Larsson, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 24, 2025
Cost effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a Swedish settingAdam Fridhammar, Kristin Johnson, Aldana Rosso, et al.
The Lancet. Digital Health|February 4, 2025
Screening performance and characteristics of breast cancer detected in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy studyVeronica Hernström, Viktoria Josefsson, Hanna Sartor, et al.
Radiology|July 30, 2024
Assessing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Impact on Early Cancer Detection: Insights from Consecutive ScreeningAnnika Jögi, Kristin Johnson, Sofia Wittgren, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (21-30 of 38) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
European Radiology|July 22, 2008
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findingsIngvar Andersson, Debra M Ikeda, Sophia Zackrisson, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|September 6, 2012
Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patternsMagnus Dustler, Ingvar Andersson, Håkan Brorson, et al.
European Radiology|January 22, 2017
Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?Magnus Dustler, Daniel Förnvik, Pontus Timberg, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|August 31, 2013
No evidence for shedding of circulating tumor cells to the peripheral venous blood as a result of mammographic breast compressionDaniel Förnvik, Ingvar Andersson, Magnus Dustler, et al.
Academic Radiology|August 21, 2002
Decreasing rate of fatty involution at screening mammographyCaroline E Blane, J Thomas Fitzgerald, Larry D Gruppen, et al.
Bioresource Technology|August 20, 2014
The effect of temperature on the catalytic conversion of Kraft lignin using near-critical waterThi Dieu Huyen Nguyen, Marco Maschietti, Lars-Erik Åmand, et al.
The Lancet. Oncology|August 4, 2023
Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy studyKristina Lång, Viktoria Josefsson, Anna-Maria Larsson, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 24, 2025
Cost effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a Swedish settingAdam Fridhammar, Kristin Johnson, Aldana Rosso, et al.
The Lancet. Digital Health|February 4, 2025
Screening performance and characteristics of breast cancer detected in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy studyVeronica Hernström, Viktoria Josefsson, Hanna Sartor, et al.
Radiology|July 30, 2024
Assessing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Impact on Early Cancer Detection: Insights from Consecutive ScreeningAnnika Jögi, Kristin Johnson, Sofia Wittgren, et al.
Pageof 4