Showing results (181-190 of 191) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 20
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|November 15, 2007
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasksJeremy M Wolfe, Todd S Horowitz, Michael J Van Wert, et al.Journal of Vision|January 17, 2009
Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effectAnina N Rich, Melina A Kunar, Michael J Van Wert, et al.Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)|February 13, 2016
Image toggling saves time in mammographyTrafton Drew, Avi M Aizenman, Matthew B Thompson, et al.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science|August 25, 2015
Visual attentionKarla K Evans, Todd S Horowitz, Piers Howe, et al.Behavior Research Methods|July 27, 2025
A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and othersHayward J Godwin, Haden Dewis, Peter T Darch, et al.Annals of Coloproctology|July 11, 2015
Expression of the Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD44 and CD133 in Colorectal Cancer: An Immunohistochemical Staining AnalysisInjae Hong, Seong Woo Hong, Yeo Goo Chang, et al.Scientific Reports|June 9, 2018
Radiologists can detect the 'gist' of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appearPatrick C Brennan, Ziba Gandomkar, Ernest U Ekpo, et al.Plos One|April 25, 2023
Reliability of radiologists' first impression when interpreting a screening mammogramZiba Gandomkar, Somphone Siviengphanom, Mo'ayyad Suleiman, et al.Scientific Reports|October 12, 2021
Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspectionZiba Gandomkar, Somphone Siviengphanom, Ernest U Ekpo, et al.Radiology|April 20, 2011
Optimizing analysis, visualization, and navigation of large image data sets: one 5000-section CT scan can ruin your whole dayKatherine P Andriole, Jeremy M Wolfe, Ramin Khorasani, et al.Pageof 20