Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Isabelle Boutron

Showing results (111-120 of 291) with videos related to

Pageof 30
Sort By:
BMC Medicine|June 21, 2019
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journalsKetevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, et al.
BMC Medicine|January 29, 2016
Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.govMarie Baudart, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, et al.
Plos Medicine|February 22, 2007
Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatmentsIsabelle Boutron, Lydia Guittet, Candice Estellat, et al.
Arthritis and Rheumatism|February 28, 2009
Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritisNizar Ahmad, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, et al.
BMJ Open|September 29, 2016
Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration detailsCéline Buffel du Vaure, Agnès Dechartres, Constance Battin, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 18, 2019
A scoping review provided a framework for new ways of doing research through mobilizing collective intelligenceVan Thu Nguyen, Mehdi Benchoufi, Bridget Young, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|March 8, 2019
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic reviewCecilia Superchi, José Antonio González, Ivan Solà, et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research|July 4, 2019
Overcoming Barriers to Mobilizing Collective Intelligence in Research: Qualitative Study of Researchers With Experience of Collective IntelligenceVan Thu Nguyen, Bridget Young, Philippe Ravaud, et al.
BMC Medicine|November 23, 2021
Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research studyVan Thu Nguyen, Mishelle Engleton, Mauricia Davison, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 8, 2020
Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic changeIsabelle Boutron, Perrine Créquit, Hywel Williams, et al.
Pageof 30

Showing results (111-120 of 291) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 30
BMC Medicine|June 21, 2019
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journalsKetevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, et al.
BMC Medicine|January 29, 2016
Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.govMarie Baudart, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, et al.
Plos Medicine|February 22, 2007
Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatmentsIsabelle Boutron, Lydia Guittet, Candice Estellat, et al.
Arthritis and Rheumatism|February 28, 2009
Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritisNizar Ahmad, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, et al.
BMJ Open|September 29, 2016
Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration detailsCéline Buffel du Vaure, Agnès Dechartres, Constance Battin, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 18, 2019
A scoping review provided a framework for new ways of doing research through mobilizing collective intelligenceVan Thu Nguyen, Mehdi Benchoufi, Bridget Young, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|March 8, 2019
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic reviewCecilia Superchi, José Antonio González, Ivan Solà, et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research|July 4, 2019
Overcoming Barriers to Mobilizing Collective Intelligence in Research: Qualitative Study of Researchers With Experience of Collective IntelligenceVan Thu Nguyen, Bridget Young, Philippe Ravaud, et al.
BMC Medicine|November 23, 2021
Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research studyVan Thu Nguyen, Mishelle Engleton, Mauricia Davison, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 8, 2020
Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic changeIsabelle Boutron, Perrine Créquit, Hywel Williams, et al.
Pageof 30