Showing results (1-10 of 499) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 50
Neurology|July 11, 2001
Does adding MS-specific items to a generic measure (the SF-36) improve measurement?J A Freeman, J C Hobart, A J ThompsonDisability and Rehabilitation|February 1, 1996
Outcomes-based research in neurorehabilitation: the need for multidisciplinary team involvementJ A Freeman, J C Hobart, A J ThompsonNeurology|January 28, 1999
Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: do the benefits carry over into the community?J A Freeman, D W Langdon, J C Hobart, et al.Annals of Neurology|August 1, 1997
The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosisJ A Freeman, D W Langdon, J C Hobart, et al.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry|January 25, 2000
Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosisJ A Freeman, J C Hobart, D W Langdon, et al.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry|April 19, 2005
Evaluating neurorehabilitation: lessons from routine data collectionJ A Freeman, J C Hobart, E D Playford, et al.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry|April 14, 1999
Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence MeasureJ J van der Putten, J C Hobart, J A Freeman, et al.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry|July 19, 2001
The five item Barthel indexJ C Hobart, A J ThompsonJournal of Neurology|May 20, 1998
Multiple sclerosis: assessment of disability and disability scalesA J Thompson, J C HobartCurrent Opinion in Neurology|December 1, 1996
Physician and patient-oriented outcomes in progressive neurological disease: which to measure?J C Hobart, J A Freeman, D L LampingPageof 50