Showing results (21-30 of 33) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Abdominal Radiology (New York)|May 16, 2022
Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging can predict prostate cancer with risk for positive surgical marginsM Quentin, L Schimmöller, T Ullrich, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 1, 2019
Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patientsT Ullrich, C Arsov, M Quentin, et al.
European Radiology|February 28, 2016
Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?L Schimmöller, M Quentin, D Blondin, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|December 24, 2021
Comparison of 3 T mpMRI and pelvic CT examinations for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancerB Valentin, C Arsov, T Ullrich, et al.
European Radiology|November 8, 2021
MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressivenessM Boschheidgen, L Schimmöller, C Arsov, et al.
Scientific Reports|April 26, 2022
Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostateM Boschheidgen, L Schimmöller, S Doerfler, et al.
Data in Brief|November 25, 2022
Data on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided targeted and systematic biopsyM Klingebiel, C Arsov, T Ullrich, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|June 7, 2017
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image qualityT Ullrich, M Quentin, C Oelers, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|February 16, 2021
Reasons for missing clinically significant prostate cancer by targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsyM Klingebiel, C Arsov, T Ullrich, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging|June 15, 2018
Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomyF Ziayee, A Müller-Lutz, J Gross, et al.
Pageof 4