Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

J Tindall

Showing results (51-60 of 571) with videos related to

Pageof 58
Sort By:
Bio Systems|October 12, 2025
Names, classification, structure and function and their inter-relationship to the Q cycle, photosynthesis and ATP synthesisBrian J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
The status of the name Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Opinion 88. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
The epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate and requires a replacement epithet. Opinion 89. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, Note 1 as applied to the corresponding specific epithets. Opinion 94. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
The genus name Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 do not contravene Rule 31a and are not to be considered as rejected names, the genus name Methanosaeta Patel and Sprott 1990 refers to the same taxon as Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 is rejected: Supplementary information to Opinion 75. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
Names at the rank of class, subclass and order, their typification and current status: Supplementary information to Opinion 79. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|August 2, 2015
A commentary on the interpretation of the International Code of Nomenclature of BacteriaBrian J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|September 19, 2019
The names <i>Hungateiclostridium</i> Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium thermocellum</i> (Viljoen <i>et al.</i> 1926) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium cellulolyticum</i> (Patel <i>et al.</i> 1980) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium aldrichii</i> (Yang <i>et al.</i> 1990) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium alkalicellulosi</i> (Zhilina <i>et al.</i> 2006) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium clariflavum</i> (Shiratori <i>et al.</i> 2009) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium straminisolvens</i> (Kato <i>et al.</i> 2004) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018 and <i>Hungateiclostridium saccincola</i> (Koeck <i>et al.</i> 2016) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018 contravene Rule 51b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and require replacement names in the genus <i>Acetivibrio</i> Patel <i>et al.</i> 1980B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|March 14, 2014
On the status of the species name Streptomyces ruanii Kumar and Goodfellow 2008B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 7, 2016
Redefining homonyms under Rule 51b (4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
Pageof 58

Showing results (51-60 of 571) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 58
Bio Systems|October 12, 2025
Names, classification, structure and function and their inter-relationship to the Q cycle, photosynthesis and ATP synthesisBrian J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
The status of the name Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Opinion 88. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
The epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate and requires a replacement epithet. Opinion 89. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, Note 1 as applied to the corresponding specific epithets. Opinion 94. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
The genus name Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 do not contravene Rule 31a and are not to be considered as rejected names, the genus name Methanosaeta Patel and Sprott 1990 refers to the same taxon as Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 is rejected: Supplementary information to Opinion 75. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 8, 2014
Names at the rank of class, subclass and order, their typification and current status: Supplementary information to Opinion 79. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|August 2, 2015
A commentary on the interpretation of the International Code of Nomenclature of BacteriaBrian J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|September 19, 2019
The names <i>Hungateiclostridium</i> Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium thermocellum</i> (Viljoen <i>et al.</i> 1926) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium cellulolyticum</i> (Patel <i>et al.</i> 1980) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium aldrichii</i> (Yang <i>et al.</i> 1990) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium alkalicellulosi</i> (Zhilina <i>et al.</i> 2006) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium clariflavum</i> (Shiratori <i>et al.</i> 2009) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018, <i>Hungateiclostridium straminisolvens</i> (Kato <i>et al.</i> 2004) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018 and <i>Hungateiclostridium saccincola</i> (Koeck <i>et al.</i> 2016) Zhang <i>et al.</i> 2018 contravene Rule 51b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and require replacement names in the genus <i>Acetivibrio</i> Patel <i>et al.</i> 1980B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|March 14, 2014
On the status of the species name Streptomyces ruanii Kumar and Goodfellow 2008B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology|October 7, 2016
Redefining homonyms under Rule 51b (4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of ProkaryotesB J Tindall
Pageof 58