Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

J W Harbell

Showing results (1-10 of 21) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Environmental Health Perspectives|May 26, 1998
In vitro alternatives for ocular irritationR D Curren, J W Harbell
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 1, 1982
Hormone requirements of the pregnancy-dependent mammary tumor of GR/A mice: an in vitro studyJ W Harbell, J S Papkoff, C W Daniel
Journal of Applied Toxicology : JAT|April 1, 1991
Gene mutation assay of acrolein in the CHO/HGPRT test systemR A Parent, H E Caravello, J W Harbell
Cancer|June 15, 1985
Human tumor cell destruction by distilled water. An in vitro evaluationD B Mercill, N R Jones, J W Harbell
Toxicology in Vitro : an International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA|July 27, 2010
Assessment of the Cytosensor Microphysiometer Assay in the COLIPA In Vitro Eye Irritation Validation StudyJ W Harbell, R Osborne, G J Carr, et al.
In Vitro|August 1, 1977
Long-term organ culture of mouse mammary glandJ W Harbell, P D Bowman, J M Shannon, et al.
Human & Experimental Toxicology|August 28, 2002
An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 3. Sensitivity and specificity are not independent of prevalence or distribution of toxicityL H Bruner, G J Carr, J W Harbell, et al.
Chemical Research in Toxicology|September 1, 1989
2,3-Dithioerythritol, a possible new arsenic antidoteV L Boyd, J W Harbell, R J O'Connor, et al.
The Journal of Investigative Dermatology|February 1, 1984
Fibronectin in basal cell epithelioma: sources and significanceR E Grimwood, J C Huff, J W Harbell, et al.
Human & Experimental Toxicology|August 28, 2002
An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 1. Toxicity test methods that have predictive capacity no greater than chanceL H Bruner, G J Carr, J W Harbell, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (1-10 of 21) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Environmental Health Perspectives|May 26, 1998
In vitro alternatives for ocular irritationR D Curren, J W Harbell
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 1, 1982
Hormone requirements of the pregnancy-dependent mammary tumor of GR/A mice: an in vitro studyJ W Harbell, J S Papkoff, C W Daniel
Journal of Applied Toxicology : JAT|April 1, 1991
Gene mutation assay of acrolein in the CHO/HGPRT test systemR A Parent, H E Caravello, J W Harbell
Cancer|June 15, 1985
Human tumor cell destruction by distilled water. An in vitro evaluationD B Mercill, N R Jones, J W Harbell
Toxicology in Vitro : an International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA|July 27, 2010
Assessment of the Cytosensor Microphysiometer Assay in the COLIPA In Vitro Eye Irritation Validation StudyJ W Harbell, R Osborne, G J Carr, et al.
In Vitro|August 1, 1977
Long-term organ culture of mouse mammary glandJ W Harbell, P D Bowman, J M Shannon, et al.
Human & Experimental Toxicology|August 28, 2002
An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 3. Sensitivity and specificity are not independent of prevalence or distribution of toxicityL H Bruner, G J Carr, J W Harbell, et al.
Chemical Research in Toxicology|September 1, 1989
2,3-Dithioerythritol, a possible new arsenic antidoteV L Boyd, J W Harbell, R J O'Connor, et al.
The Journal of Investigative Dermatology|February 1, 1984
Fibronectin in basal cell epithelioma: sources and significanceR E Grimwood, J C Huff, J W Harbell, et al.
Human & Experimental Toxicology|August 28, 2002
An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 1. Toxicity test methods that have predictive capacity no greater than chanceL H Bruner, G J Carr, J W Harbell, et al.
Pageof 3