Showing results (21-30 of 27) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 27 results.
Human Reproduction Open|June 13, 2022
Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trialT R Zaat, J P de Bruin, M Goddijn, et al.
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)|October 26, 2025
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes from the follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial investigating time-lapse embryo monitoringD C Kieslinger, C G Vergouw, F von Estorff, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|April 2, 2023
Clinical outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted standard culture (SelecTIMO): a three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trialD C Kieslinger, C G Vergouw, L Ramos, et al.
BMJ Open|May 28, 2017
The SUPER study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing follicle-stimulating hormone and clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine inseminationN A Danhof, M van Wely, C A M Koks, et al.
BMC Women'S Health|July 23, 2017
Endometrial scratching in women with implantation failure after a first IVF/ICSI cycle; does it lead to a higher live birth rate? The SCRaTCH study: a randomized controlled trial (NTR 5342)N E van Hoogenhuijze, H L Torrance, F Mol, et al.
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)|December 5, 2021
Economic evaluation of endometrial scratching before the second IVF/ICSI treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial (SCRaTCH trial)N E van Hoogenhuijze, R van Eekelen, F Mol, et al.
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)|December 8, 2020
Endometrial scratching in women with one failed IVF/ICSI cycle-outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (SCRaTCH)N E van Hoogenhuijze, F Mol, J S E Laven, et al.
Pageof 3