Showing results (1-10 of 357) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 36
Plos One|March 27, 2010
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review processJamie J Kirkham, Doug G Altman, Paula R WilliamsonBMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|May 19, 2017
A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritisJamie J Kirkham, Mike Clarke, Paula R WilliamsonStatistics in Medicine|April 26, 2012
A multivariate meta-analysis approach for reducing the impact of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviewsJamie J Kirkham, Richard D Riley, Paula R WilliamsonTrials|January 24, 2013
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review GroupsJamie J Kirkham, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.Plos One|July 18, 2013
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated reviewKerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R Williamson, et al.BMJ Open|June 25, 2013
Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosisKerry Dwan, Jamie J Kirkham, Paula R Williamson, et al.Plos One|September 14, 2019
Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome setsKaren L Hughes, Jamie J Kirkham, Mike Clarke, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 23, 2019
Improvement was needed in the standards of development for cancer core outcome setsElizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Jane M Blazeby, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 27, 2017
Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptakeKaren L Barnes, Jamie J Kirkham, Mike Clarke, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 25, 2014
Multivariate meta-analysis helps examine the impact of outcome reporting bias in Cochrane rheumatoid arthritis reviewsGiacomo Frosi, Richard D Riley, Paula R Williamson, et al.Pageof 36