Showing results (61-70 of 81) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 9
Lancet (London, England)|March 18, 2014
Differential clinical outcomes after 1 year versus 5 years in a randomised comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (the SORT OUT III study): a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trialMichael Maeng, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Lisette Okkels Jensen, et al.
European Heart Journal|October 14, 2015
Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients presenting with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventionDerek J Hausenloy, Rajesh Kharbanda, Michael Rahbek Schmidt, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|August 25, 2012
3-Year clinical outcomes in the randomized SORT OUT III superiority trial comparing zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting coronary stentsMichael Maeng, Hans-Henrik Tilsted, Lisette Okkels Jensen, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|January 23, 2017
Comparison of Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting and Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT VI TrialBent Raungaard, Evald H Christiansen, Hans Erik Bøtker, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|January 21, 2015
Zotarolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stent versus a biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT VI): a randomised non-inferiority trialBent Raungaard, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Hans-Henrik Tilsted, et al.
Circulation|February 7, 2012
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome IV (SORT OUT IV)Lisette Okkels Jensen, Per Thayssen, Henrik Steen Hansen, et al.
JAMA|January 31, 2008
Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trialAnders M Galløe, Leif Thuesen, Henning Kelbaek, et al.
European Heart Journal|May 11, 2016
Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with simple or complex stenting: 5-year survival from patient-level pooled analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary StudyMiles W Behan, Niels R Holm, Adam J de Belder, et al.
Circulation|October 25, 2006
Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation studyTerje K Steigen, Michael Maeng, Rune Wiseth, et al.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions|November 23, 2013
Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up resultsKari Kervinen, Matti Niemelä, Hannu Romppanen, et al.
Pageof 9