Showing results (1-10 of 231) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 24
Psychological Methods|June 19, 2008
Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: is fair selection possible?Denny Borsboom, Jan-Willem Romeijn, Jelte M WichertsPlos One|November 11, 2011
Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical resultsJelte M Wicherts, Marjan Bakker, Dylan MolenaarFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience|April 27, 2012
Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in scienceJelte M Wicherts, Rogier A Kievit, Marjan Bakker, et al.Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI|December 1, 2017
The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)Jelte M WichertsPlos One|January 30, 2016
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription JournalsJelte M WichertsCognitive Neuroscience|October 31, 2013
Intelligence and the brain: A model-based approachRogier A Kievit, Hilko van Rooijen, Jelte M Wicherts, et al.The Clinical Neuropsychologist|July 1, 2016
The importance of measurement invariance in neurocognitive ability testingJelte M WichertsJournal of Biosocial Science|July 18, 2018
IGNORING PSYCHOMETRIC PROBLEMS IN THE STUDY OF GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE TEST PERFORMANCEJelte M WichertsPlos One|July 30, 2014
Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological researchMarjan Bakker, Jelte M WichertsPageof 24