Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jelte Wicherts

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Nature|September 8, 2021
How misconduct helped psychological science to thriveJelte Wicherts
Nature|October 23, 2009
Sharing: guidelines go one step forwards, two steps backJelte Wicherts, Marjan Bakker
Royal Society Open Science|June 26, 2025
Good, bad, different or something else? A scoping review of the convictions, conventions and developments around quality in qualitative researchXavier Salet, John Gelissen, Guy Moors, et al.
Journal of Sex Research|March 7, 2008
Women's scores on the sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales (SIS/SES): gender similarities and differencesDeanna Carpenter, Erick Janssen, Cynthia Graham, et al.
Psychological Methods|May 11, 2023
Meta-analyzing the multiverse: A peek under the hood of selective reportingAnton Olsson-Collentine, Robbie C M van Aert, Marjan Bakker, et al.
Journal of Anthropological Sciences = Rivista Di Antropologia : JASS|July 15, 2014
Perspectives on Open Science and scientific data sharing:an interdisciplinary workshopGiovanni Destro Bisol, Paolo Anagnostou, Marco Capocasa, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|July 25, 2024
Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studiesAlexandra Sarafoglou, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, et al.
Elife|November 9, 2021
Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studiesBalazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Gustav Nilsonne, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Nature|September 8, 2021
How misconduct helped psychological science to thriveJelte Wicherts
Nature|October 23, 2009
Sharing: guidelines go one step forwards, two steps backJelte Wicherts, Marjan Bakker
Royal Society Open Science|June 26, 2025
Good, bad, different or something else? A scoping review of the convictions, conventions and developments around quality in qualitative researchXavier Salet, John Gelissen, Guy Moors, et al.
Journal of Sex Research|March 7, 2008
Women's scores on the sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales (SIS/SES): gender similarities and differencesDeanna Carpenter, Erick Janssen, Cynthia Graham, et al.
Psychological Methods|May 11, 2023
Meta-analyzing the multiverse: A peek under the hood of selective reportingAnton Olsson-Collentine, Robbie C M van Aert, Marjan Bakker, et al.
Journal of Anthropological Sciences = Rivista Di Antropologia : JASS|July 15, 2014
Perspectives on Open Science and scientific data sharing:an interdisciplinary workshopGiovanni Destro Bisol, Paolo Anagnostou, Marco Capocasa, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|July 25, 2024
Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studiesAlexandra Sarafoglou, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, et al.
Elife|November 9, 2021
Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studiesBalazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Gustav Nilsonne, et al.
Pageof 1