Showing results (1-10 of 156) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 16
BMJ Open|February 23, 2020
Did psychosocial status, sociodemographics and smoking status affect non-attendance in control participants in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial? A nested observational studyJessica Malmqvist, Volkert Siersma, Hanne Thorsen, et al.BMJ Open|June 7, 2020
Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort studyJakob Fraes Rasmussen, Volkert Siersma, Jessica Malmqvist, et al.BMJ Open|January 24, 2020
Direct and indirect healthcare costs of lung cancer CT screening in Denmark: a registry studyManja Dahl Jensen, Volkert Siersma, Jakob Fraes Rasmussen, et al.Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine|May 1, 2015
Waiting time and the psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography: cohort studyBruno Heleno, Volkert Siersma, John BrodersenAnnals of Family Medicine|May 13, 2015
Diagnostic invasiveness and psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammographyBruno Heleno, Volkert Dirk Siersma, John BrodersenThe European Journal of General Practice|February 1, 2018
Quaternary prevention: reviewing the conceptCarlos Martins, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Bruno Heleno, et al.Breathe (Sheffield, England)|March 21, 2020
Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trialsJohn Brodersen, Theis Voss, Frederik Martiny, et al.BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 18, 2013
Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature reviewBruno Heleno, Maria F Thomsen, David S Rodrigues, et al.Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|January 15, 2014
Healthcare costs in the Danish randomised controlled lung cancer CT-screening trial: a registry studyJakob F Rasmussen, Volkert Siersma, Jesper H Pedersen, et al.The European Journal of General Practice|March 17, 2017
How to conduct research on overdiagnosis. A keynote paper from the EGPRN May 2016, Tel AvivJohn BrodersenPageof 16