Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

John Brodersen

Showing results (91-100 of 166) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
Disability and Rehabilitation|June 24, 2017
Adaptation of the Activity Measure Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) from English to Mandarin using the dual-panel translation approachFeng-Hang Chang, Tsan-Hon Liou, John Brodersen, et al.
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|April 28, 2016
Do invitations for cervical screening provide sufficient information to enable informed choice? A cross-sectional study of invitations for publicly funded cervical screeningSie Karen Kolthoff, Mie Sara Hestbech, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care|November 26, 2020
Psychosocial consequences of potential overdiagnosis in prostate cancer a qualitative interview studySigrid Brisson Nielsen, Olivia Spalletta, Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, et al.
BMC Family Practice|June 19, 2021
Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional studyCamilla Aakjær Andersen, John Brodersen, Torsten Rahbek Rudbæk, et al.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice|April 24, 2012
Marginal public health gain of screening for colorectal cancer: modelling study, based on WHO and national databases in the Nordic countriesJohann A Sigurdsson, Linn Getz, Göran Sjönell, et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences|July 19, 2012
Adaptation to Swedish and further development of the 'Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer' questionnaire: a multimethod studyAnetta Bolejko, Christine Wann-Hansson, Sophia Zackrisson, et al.
Breathe (Sheffield, England)|March 21, 2020
Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trialsJohn Brodersen, Theis Voss, Frederik Martiny, et al.
BMC Public Health|August 5, 2016
How does HPV vaccination status relate to risk perceptions and intention to participate in cervical screening? a survey studyMie Sara Hestbech, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Jakob Kragstrup, et al.
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|February 18, 2011
Participation bias in a randomised trial of screening for lung cancerMie Sara Hestbech, Volkert Siersma, Asger Dirksen, et al.
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|March 16, 2021
Psychosocial consequences of a three-month follow-up after receiving an abnormal lung cancer CT-screening result: A longitudinal surveyChristina Sadolin Damhus, Julie Greve Quentin, Jessica Malmqvist, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (91-100 of 166) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
Disability and Rehabilitation|June 24, 2017
Adaptation of the Activity Measure Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) from English to Mandarin using the dual-panel translation approachFeng-Hang Chang, Tsan-Hon Liou, John Brodersen, et al.
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|April 28, 2016
Do invitations for cervical screening provide sufficient information to enable informed choice? A cross-sectional study of invitations for publicly funded cervical screeningSie Karen Kolthoff, Mie Sara Hestbech, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care|November 26, 2020
Psychosocial consequences of potential overdiagnosis in prostate cancer a qualitative interview studySigrid Brisson Nielsen, Olivia Spalletta, Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, et al.
BMC Family Practice|June 19, 2021
Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional studyCamilla Aakjær Andersen, John Brodersen, Torsten Rahbek Rudbæk, et al.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice|April 24, 2012
Marginal public health gain of screening for colorectal cancer: modelling study, based on WHO and national databases in the Nordic countriesJohann A Sigurdsson, Linn Getz, Göran Sjönell, et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences|July 19, 2012
Adaptation to Swedish and further development of the 'Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer' questionnaire: a multimethod studyAnetta Bolejko, Christine Wann-Hansson, Sophia Zackrisson, et al.
Breathe (Sheffield, England)|March 21, 2020
Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trialsJohn Brodersen, Theis Voss, Frederik Martiny, et al.
BMC Public Health|August 5, 2016
How does HPV vaccination status relate to risk perceptions and intention to participate in cervical screening? a survey studyMie Sara Hestbech, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Jakob Kragstrup, et al.
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|February 18, 2011
Participation bias in a randomised trial of screening for lung cancerMie Sara Hestbech, Volkert Siersma, Asger Dirksen, et al.
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|March 16, 2021
Psychosocial consequences of a three-month follow-up after receiving an abnormal lung cancer CT-screening result: A longitudinal surveyChristina Sadolin Damhus, Julie Greve Quentin, Jessica Malmqvist, et al.
Pageof 17