Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

John Brodersen

Showing results (61-70 of 166) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes|March 26, 2017
Development and validation of a condition-specific diary to measure severity, bothersomeness and impact on daily activities for patients with acute urinary tract infection in primary careAnne Holm, Gloria Cordoba, Volkert Siersma, et al.
Journal of Vascular Nursing : Official Publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing|May 22, 2017
Experiences of the screening process and the diagnosis abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old men from invitation to a 1-year surveillanceMonica Pettersson, Anders Hansson, John Brodersen, et al.
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|May 31, 2011
The future of national health systemsIona Heath, Dee Mangin, Les Toop, et al.
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej|March 25, 2010
The benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screeningJohn Brodersen, Karsten J Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health|June 21, 2005
Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?John Brodersen, Hanne Thorsen, Stephen McKenna, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|December 31, 2004
Validity of short-term consequences of cancer prevention and screening activities?John Brodersen, John Broderson, Hanne Thorsen, et al.
BMC Psychology|January 8, 2021
Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaireJessica Malmqvist, Volkert Siersma, Christine Winther Bang, et al.
BMC Research Notes|September 4, 2015
Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative studyMikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen, Ann Dorrit Guassora, John Brodersen
The European Journal of General Practice|February 1, 2018
Quaternary prevention: reviewing the conceptCarlos Martins, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Bruno Heleno, et al.
BMJ Open|June 7, 2020
Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort studyJakob Fraes Rasmussen, Volkert Siersma, Jessica Malmqvist, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (61-70 of 166) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes|March 26, 2017
Development and validation of a condition-specific diary to measure severity, bothersomeness and impact on daily activities for patients with acute urinary tract infection in primary careAnne Holm, Gloria Cordoba, Volkert Siersma, et al.
Journal of Vascular Nursing : Official Publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing|May 22, 2017
Experiences of the screening process and the diagnosis abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old men from invitation to a 1-year surveillanceMonica Pettersson, Anders Hansson, John Brodersen, et al.
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|May 31, 2011
The future of national health systemsIona Heath, Dee Mangin, Les Toop, et al.
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej|March 25, 2010
The benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screeningJohn Brodersen, Karsten J Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health|June 21, 2005
Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?John Brodersen, Hanne Thorsen, Stephen McKenna, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|December 31, 2004
Validity of short-term consequences of cancer prevention and screening activities?John Brodersen, John Broderson, Hanne Thorsen, et al.
BMC Psychology|January 8, 2021
Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaireJessica Malmqvist, Volkert Siersma, Christine Winther Bang, et al.
BMC Research Notes|September 4, 2015
Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative studyMikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen, Ann Dorrit Guassora, John Brodersen
The European Journal of General Practice|February 1, 2018
Quaternary prevention: reviewing the conceptCarlos Martins, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Bruno Heleno, et al.
BMJ Open|June 7, 2020
Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort studyJakob Fraes Rasmussen, Volkert Siersma, Jessica Malmqvist, et al.
Pageof 17