Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

John M Deeks

Showing results (11-20 of 54) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|July 19, 2013
Polarity effects on place pitch and loudness for three cochlear-implant designs and at different cochlear sitesRobert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Olivier Macherey
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|April 10, 2008
Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cuesRobert P Carlyon, Christopher J Long, John M Deeks
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|January 10, 2013
Further examination of complex pitch perception in the absence of a place-rate matchJohn M Deeks, Hedwig E Gockel, Robert P Carlyon
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|March 25, 2010
The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulatedRobert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Colette M McKay
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|September 15, 2005
Can dichotic pitches form two streams?Michael A Akeroyd, Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO|July 4, 2015
Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical StimulationRobert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Colette M McKay
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO|January 26, 2022
Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant UsersJessica J M Monaghan, Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks
IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering|September 10, 2015
Multistage Nonlinear Optimization to Recover Neural Activation Patterns From Evoked Compound Action Potentials of Cochlear Implant UsersStefano Cosentino, Etienne Gaudrain, John M Deeks, et al.
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO|August 18, 2020
The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant ListenersWiebke Lamping, John M Deeks, Jeremy Marozeau, et al.
International Journal of Audiology|October 31, 2014
Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulsesRobert P Carlyon, Jolijn Monstrey, John M Deeks, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (11-20 of 54) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|July 19, 2013
Polarity effects on place pitch and loudness for three cochlear-implant designs and at different cochlear sitesRobert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Olivier Macherey
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|April 10, 2008
Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cuesRobert P Carlyon, Christopher J Long, John M Deeks
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|January 10, 2013
Further examination of complex pitch perception in the absence of a place-rate matchJohn M Deeks, Hedwig E Gockel, Robert P Carlyon
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|March 25, 2010
The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulatedRobert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Colette M McKay
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|September 15, 2005
Can dichotic pitches form two streams?Michael A Akeroyd, Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO|July 4, 2015
Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical StimulationRobert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Colette M McKay
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO|January 26, 2022
Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant UsersJessica J M Monaghan, Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks
IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering|September 10, 2015
Multistage Nonlinear Optimization to Recover Neural Activation Patterns From Evoked Compound Action Potentials of Cochlear Implant UsersStefano Cosentino, Etienne Gaudrain, John M Deeks, et al.
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO|August 18, 2020
The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant ListenersWiebke Lamping, John M Deeks, Jeremy Marozeau, et al.
International Journal of Audiology|October 31, 2014
Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulsesRobert P Carlyon, Jolijn Monstrey, John M Deeks, et al.
Pageof 6