Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jon Deeks

Showing results (31-40 of 39) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 39 results.
BMJ Open|August 11, 2016
Refining Ovarian Cancer Test accuracy Scores (ROCkeTS): protocol for a prospective longitudinal test accuracy study to validate new risk scores in women with symptoms of suspected ovarian cancerSudha Sundar, Caroline Rick, Francis Dowling, et al.
The Lancet. Oncology|October 3, 2024
Risk-prediction models in postmenopausal patients with symptoms of suspected ovarian cancer in the UK (ROCkeTS): a multicentre, prospective diagnostic accuracy studySudha Sundar, Ridhi Agarwal, Clare Davenport, et al.
Nature Reviews. Cardiology|December 25, 2015
Expert consensus document: Defining the major health modifiers causing atrial fibrillation: a roadmap to underpin personalized prevention and treatmentLarissa Fabritz, Eduard Guasch, Charalambos Antoniades, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|February 7, 2018
PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancerPaula Ghaneh, Robert Hanson, Andrew Titman, et al.
Nature Medicine|October 12, 2021
A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AIViknesh Sounderajah, Hutan Ashrafian, Sherri Rose, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovationPatrick L Ergina, Jonathan A Cook, Jane M Blazeby, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovationsJeffrey S Barkun, Jeffrey K Aronson, Liane S Feldman, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendationsPeter McCulloch, Douglas G Altman, W Bruce Campbell, et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research|May 17, 2019
Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkersGowri Gopalakrishna, Miranda Langendam, Rob Scholten, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (31-40 of 39) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 39 results.
BMJ Open|August 11, 2016
Refining Ovarian Cancer Test accuracy Scores (ROCkeTS): protocol for a prospective longitudinal test accuracy study to validate new risk scores in women with symptoms of suspected ovarian cancerSudha Sundar, Caroline Rick, Francis Dowling, et al.
The Lancet. Oncology|October 3, 2024
Risk-prediction models in postmenopausal patients with symptoms of suspected ovarian cancer in the UK (ROCkeTS): a multicentre, prospective diagnostic accuracy studySudha Sundar, Ridhi Agarwal, Clare Davenport, et al.
Nature Reviews. Cardiology|December 25, 2015
Expert consensus document: Defining the major health modifiers causing atrial fibrillation: a roadmap to underpin personalized prevention and treatmentLarissa Fabritz, Eduard Guasch, Charalambos Antoniades, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|February 7, 2018
PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancerPaula Ghaneh, Robert Hanson, Andrew Titman, et al.
Nature Medicine|October 12, 2021
A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AIViknesh Sounderajah, Hutan Ashrafian, Sherri Rose, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovationPatrick L Ergina, Jonathan A Cook, Jane M Blazeby, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovationsJeffrey S Barkun, Jeffrey K Aronson, Liane S Feldman, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendationsPeter McCulloch, Douglas G Altman, W Bruce Campbell, et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research|May 17, 2019
Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkersGowri Gopalakrishna, Miranda Langendam, Rob Scholten, et al.
Pageof 4