Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (1-10 of 713) with videos related to
Page
of 72
Sort By:
BJU International
|
November 7, 2017
Central pathology review of radical prostatectomy specimens does make a difference not only with grade
Jonathan I Epstein
Current Opinion in Urology
|
November 16, 2021
Is Grade Group 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) adenocarcinoma of the prostate really cancer?
Jonathan I Epstein
Virchows Archiv : an International Journal of Pathology
|
December 3, 2008
Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma
Jonathan I Epstein
Annales De Pathologie
|
November 8, 2011
Update on the Gleason grading system
Jonathan I Epstein
The Journal of Urology
|
December 14, 2012
Re: Editorial comment on urologists' self-referral for pathology of biopsy specimens linked to increased use and lower prostate cancer detection (Health Aff [Millwood] 2012; 31: 741-749): P. C. Walsh J Urol 2012; 188: 1767
Jonathan I Epstein
BJU International
|
May 14, 2016
Current Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7: has it lost its significance compared with its historical counterpart?
Jonathan I Epstein
Nature Reviews. Urology
|
June 9, 2016
Prostate cancer: Urology journals recommend new prostate cancer grade groups
Jonathan I Epstein
Histopathology
|
October 6, 2020
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate does not always represent invasive high-grade carcinoma extending into ducts
Jonathan I Epstein
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
|
January 29, 2008
Radial distance of extraprostatic extension measured by an ocular micrometer is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence: a new proposal for the substaging of pT3a prostate cancer
Jonathan I Epstein
European Urology
|
January 2, 2017
Prostate Cancer Grade Groups Correlate with Prostate-specific Cancer Mortality: SEER Data for Contemporary Graded Specimens
Jonathan I Epstein
Page
of 72
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (1-10 of 713) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 72
BJU International
|
November 7, 2017
Central pathology review of radical prostatectomy specimens does make a difference not only with grade
Jonathan I Epstein
Current Opinion in Urology
|
November 16, 2021
Is Grade Group 1 (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) adenocarcinoma of the prostate really cancer?
Jonathan I Epstein
Virchows Archiv : an International Journal of Pathology
|
December 3, 2008
Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma
Jonathan I Epstein
Annales De Pathologie
|
November 8, 2011
Update on the Gleason grading system
Jonathan I Epstein
The Journal of Urology
|
December 14, 2012
Re: Editorial comment on urologists' self-referral for pathology of biopsy specimens linked to increased use and lower prostate cancer detection (Health Aff [Millwood] 2012; 31: 741-749): P. C. Walsh J Urol 2012; 188: 1767
Jonathan I Epstein
BJU International
|
May 14, 2016
Current Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7: has it lost its significance compared with its historical counterpart?
Jonathan I Epstein
Nature Reviews. Urology
|
June 9, 2016
Prostate cancer: Urology journals recommend new prostate cancer grade groups
Jonathan I Epstein
Histopathology
|
October 6, 2020
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate does not always represent invasive high-grade carcinoma extending into ducts
Jonathan I Epstein
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
|
January 29, 2008
Radial distance of extraprostatic extension measured by an ocular micrometer is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence: a new proposal for the substaging of pT3a prostate cancer
Jonathan I Epstein
European Urology
|
January 2, 2017
Prostate Cancer Grade Groups Correlate with Prostate-specific Cancer Mortality: SEER Data for Contemporary Graded Specimens
Jonathan I Epstein
Page
of 72