Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jonathan I Epstein

Showing results (11-20 of 713) with videos related to

Pageof 72
Sort By:
Nature Clinical Practice. Urology|April 3, 2008
Does tertiary Gleason score 5 have prognostic significance in men with prostate cancer?Jonathan I Epstein
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology|August 6, 2003
The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement?Jonathan I Epstein
International Journal of Surgical Pathology|May 21, 2010
Radical prostatectomy: processing, staging, and prognosis. Parts I and IIJonathan I Epstein
Urology|March 8, 2011
Editorial comment. Long-term follow-up of men with isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia followed by serial delayed interval biopsyJonathan I Epstein
BJU International|February 18, 2014
Once again Gleason remains the grading system to beat: a comparison with using percentage pattern 4/5Jonathan I Epstein
The Prostate|July 13, 2021
Very low-risk versus low-risk prostate cancer: A distinction worth keepingJonathan I Epstein
Urology|November 26, 2013
Editorial commentJonathan I Epstein
Urology|September 14, 2010
Editorial commentJonathan I Epstein
Modern Pathology : an Official Journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc|September 3, 2010
The FAQ initiative explaining pathology reports to patientsJonathan I Epstein
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology|March 24, 2016
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading of Prostate Cancer: Author's ReplyJonathan I Epstein
Pageof 72

Showing results (11-20 of 713) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 72
Nature Clinical Practice. Urology|April 3, 2008
Does tertiary Gleason score 5 have prognostic significance in men with prostate cancer?Jonathan I Epstein
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology|August 6, 2003
The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement?Jonathan I Epstein
International Journal of Surgical Pathology|May 21, 2010
Radical prostatectomy: processing, staging, and prognosis. Parts I and IIJonathan I Epstein
Urology|March 8, 2011
Editorial comment. Long-term follow-up of men with isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia followed by serial delayed interval biopsyJonathan I Epstein
BJU International|February 18, 2014
Once again Gleason remains the grading system to beat: a comparison with using percentage pattern 4/5Jonathan I Epstein
The Prostate|July 13, 2021
Very low-risk versus low-risk prostate cancer: A distinction worth keepingJonathan I Epstein
Urology|November 26, 2013
Editorial commentJonathan I Epstein
Urology|September 14, 2010
Editorial commentJonathan I Epstein
Modern Pathology : an Official Journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc|September 3, 2010
The FAQ initiative explaining pathology reports to patientsJonathan I Epstein
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology|March 24, 2016
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading of Prostate Cancer: Author's ReplyJonathan I Epstein
Pageof 72