Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Joseph F Mudge

Showing results (1-10 of 15) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
The New Phytologist|July 10, 2013
Explicit consideration of critical effect sizes and costs of errors can improve decision-making in plant scienceJoseph F Mudge
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety|August 24, 2019
Wetland macrophyte community response to and recovery from direct application of glyphosate-based herbicidesJoseph F Mudge, Jeffrey E Houlahan
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry|April 5, 2013
Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicologyThijs Bosker, Joseph F Mudge, Kelly R Munkittrick
Bioessays : News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology|October 20, 2012
Optimizing α for better statistical decisions: a case study involving the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis: optimal α levels set to minimize Type I and II errors frequently result in different conclusions from those using α = 0.05Joseph F Mudge, Faith M Penny, Jeff E Houlahan
Plos One|March 6, 2012
Setting an optimal α that minimizes errors in null hypothesis significance testsJoseph F Mudge, Leanne F Baker, Christopher B Edge, et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management|June 30, 2015
Monte Carlo-based distance analysis using unit mass resolution ICP-MS data for shellfish site of origin verificationJoseph F Mudge, Marc E Engel, Caitlin N Ryan, et al.
Environmental Science & Technology|August 10, 2012
Negative consequences of using α = 0.05 for environmental monitoring decisions: a case study from a decade of Canada's Environmental Effects Monitoring ProgramJoseph F Mudge, Timothy J Barrett, Kelly R Munkittrick, et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management|June 19, 2012
If all of your friends used α = 0.05, would you do it too?Joseph F Mudge, Christopher B Edge, Leanne F Baker, et al.
Environmental Science & Technology|February 14, 2014
C60 fullerene soil sorption, biodegradation, and plant uptakeRaghavendhran Avanasi, William A Jackson, Brie Sherwin, et al.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry|June 6, 2014
The direct and indirect effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide and nutrients on Chironomidae (Diptera) emerging from small wetlandsLeanne F Baker, Joseph F Mudge, Jeff E Houlahan, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 15) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
The New Phytologist|July 10, 2013
Explicit consideration of critical effect sizes and costs of errors can improve decision-making in plant scienceJoseph F Mudge
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety|August 24, 2019
Wetland macrophyte community response to and recovery from direct application of glyphosate-based herbicidesJoseph F Mudge, Jeffrey E Houlahan
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry|April 5, 2013
Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicologyThijs Bosker, Joseph F Mudge, Kelly R Munkittrick
Bioessays : News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology|October 20, 2012
Optimizing α for better statistical decisions: a case study involving the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis: optimal α levels set to minimize Type I and II errors frequently result in different conclusions from those using α = 0.05Joseph F Mudge, Faith M Penny, Jeff E Houlahan
Plos One|March 6, 2012
Setting an optimal α that minimizes errors in null hypothesis significance testsJoseph F Mudge, Leanne F Baker, Christopher B Edge, et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management|June 30, 2015
Monte Carlo-based distance analysis using unit mass resolution ICP-MS data for shellfish site of origin verificationJoseph F Mudge, Marc E Engel, Caitlin N Ryan, et al.
Environmental Science & Technology|August 10, 2012
Negative consequences of using α = 0.05 for environmental monitoring decisions: a case study from a decade of Canada's Environmental Effects Monitoring ProgramJoseph F Mudge, Timothy J Barrett, Kelly R Munkittrick, et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management|June 19, 2012
If all of your friends used α = 0.05, would you do it too?Joseph F Mudge, Christopher B Edge, Leanne F Baker, et al.
Environmental Science & Technology|February 14, 2014
C60 fullerene soil sorption, biodegradation, and plant uptakeRaghavendhran Avanasi, William A Jackson, Brie Sherwin, et al.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry|June 6, 2014
The direct and indirect effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide and nutrients on Chironomidae (Diptera) emerging from small wetlandsLeanne F Baker, Joseph F Mudge, Jeff E Houlahan, et al.
Pageof 2