Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jules H Sumkin

Showing results (31-40 of 66) with videos related to

Pageof 7
Sort By:
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 18, 2016
Core Breast Biopsies Showing Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Should Be Excised and Surveillance Is Reasonable for Atypical Lobular HyperplasiaLauren Q Chang Sen, Wendie A Berg, Regina J Hooley, et al.
Scientific Reports|May 20, 2017
DCE-MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified from an Early versus Delayed Post-contrast Sequence: Association with Breast Cancer PresenceShandong Wu, Margarita L Zuley, Wendie A Berg, et al.
Radiology|March 17, 2005
Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practiceDavid Gur, Luisa P Wallace, Amy H Klym, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|February 24, 2011
Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigmDavid Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Howard E Rockette, et al.
Radiology|March 1, 2006
Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?Marie A Ganott, Jules H Sumkin, Jill L King, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|July 25, 2016
Breast MRI contrast enhancement kinetics of normal parenchyma correlate with presence of breast cancerShandong Wu, Wendie A Berg, Margarita L Zuley, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|February 5, 2004
Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection systemDavid Gur, Jules H Sumkin, Howard E Rockette, et al.
Radiology|November 22, 2012
Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trialElizabeth A Rafferty, Jeong Mi Park, Liane E Philpotts, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 24, 2014
Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader studyElizabeth A Rafferty, Jeong Mi Park, Liane E Philpotts, et al.
Radiology|September 11, 2004
Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessmentDavid Gur, Jennifer S Stalder, Lara A Hardesty, et al.
Pageof 7

Showing results (31-40 of 66) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 7
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 18, 2016
Core Breast Biopsies Showing Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Should Be Excised and Surveillance Is Reasonable for Atypical Lobular HyperplasiaLauren Q Chang Sen, Wendie A Berg, Regina J Hooley, et al.
Scientific Reports|May 20, 2017
DCE-MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified from an Early versus Delayed Post-contrast Sequence: Association with Breast Cancer PresenceShandong Wu, Margarita L Zuley, Wendie A Berg, et al.
Radiology|March 17, 2005
Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practiceDavid Gur, Luisa P Wallace, Amy H Klym, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|February 24, 2011
Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigmDavid Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Howard E Rockette, et al.
Radiology|March 1, 2006
Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?Marie A Ganott, Jules H Sumkin, Jill L King, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|July 25, 2016
Breast MRI contrast enhancement kinetics of normal parenchyma correlate with presence of breast cancerShandong Wu, Wendie A Berg, Margarita L Zuley, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|February 5, 2004
Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection systemDavid Gur, Jules H Sumkin, Howard E Rockette, et al.
Radiology|November 22, 2012
Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trialElizabeth A Rafferty, Jeong Mi Park, Liane E Philpotts, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 24, 2014
Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader studyElizabeth A Rafferty, Jeong Mi Park, Liane E Philpotts, et al.
Radiology|September 11, 2004
Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessmentDavid Gur, Jennifer S Stalder, Lara A Hardesty, et al.
Pageof 7