Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jules H Sumkin

Showing results (41-50 of 66) with videos related to

Pageof 7
Sort By:
Academic Radiology|March 19, 2010
Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Howard E Rockette, et al.
Academic Radiology|December 29, 2009
Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observationsMargarita L Zuley, Andriy I Bandos, Gordon S Abrams, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|December 20, 2002
Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessmentJules H Sumkin, Herta M Klaman, Marianne Graham, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 25, 2011
Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparisonM Lee Spangler, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, et al.
Academic Radiology|July 31, 2007
Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference libraryBin Zheng, Claudia Mello-Thoms, Xiao-Hui Wang, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 24, 2003
Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examinationJules H Sumkin, Brenda L Holbert, Jennifer S Herrmann, et al.
Medical Physics|August 14, 2008
Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary studyBin Zheng, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 20, 2002
Observer performance studies: detection of single versus multiple abnormalities of the chestCarl R Fuhrman, Cynthia A Britton, Thomas Bender, et al.
Academic Radiology|September 23, 2015
Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective TrialJules H Sumkin, Marie A Ganott, Denise M Chough, et al.
Radiology|November 13, 2012
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesionsMargarita L Zuley, Andriy I Bandos, Marie A Ganott, et al.
Pageof 7

Showing results (41-50 of 66) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 7
Academic Radiology|March 19, 2010
Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?David Gur, Andriy I Bandos, Howard E Rockette, et al.
Academic Radiology|December 29, 2009
Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observationsMargarita L Zuley, Andriy I Bandos, Gordon S Abrams, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|December 20, 2002
Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessmentJules H Sumkin, Herta M Klaman, Marianne Graham, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 25, 2011
Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparisonM Lee Spangler, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, et al.
Academic Radiology|July 31, 2007
Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference libraryBin Zheng, Claudia Mello-Thoms, Xiao-Hui Wang, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 24, 2003
Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examinationJules H Sumkin, Brenda L Holbert, Jennifer S Herrmann, et al.
Medical Physics|August 14, 2008
Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary studyBin Zheng, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 20, 2002
Observer performance studies: detection of single versus multiple abnormalities of the chestCarl R Fuhrman, Cynthia A Britton, Thomas Bender, et al.
Academic Radiology|September 23, 2015
Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective TrialJules H Sumkin, Marie A Ganott, Denise M Chough, et al.
Radiology|November 13, 2012
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesionsMargarita L Zuley, Andriy I Bandos, Marie A Ganott, et al.
Pageof 7