Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

K D Hopper

Showing results (111-120 of 134) with videos related to

Pageof 14
Sort By:
Radiology|September 1, 1990
Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gunS H Parker, J D Lovin, W E Jobe, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 20, 2001
CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methodsK A Addis, K D Hopper, T A Iyriboz, et al.
Clinical Imaging|January 9, 1998
Utility of low mA 1.5 pitch helical versus conventional high mA abdominal CTK D Hopper, N C Keeton, C J Kasales, et al.
Investigative Radiology|December 5, 1997
Comparison of 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch abdominal helical computed tomography in evaluation of normal structures and pathologic lesionsK D Hopper, C J Kasales, R P Mahraj, et al.
Radiology|December 9, 1998
CT bronchoscopy: optimization of imaging parametersK D Hopper, T A Iyriboz, R P Mahraj, et al.
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging|January 1, 1991
The efficacy of transrectal ultrasound and prostate cancerM J Mandell, K D Hopper, M V Jarowenko, et al.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography|June 2, 1998
The optimization of helical thoracic CTK D Hopper, C J Kasales, S W Wise, et al.
Investigative Radiology|September 18, 1997
The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomographyK D Hopper, S J Huber, C J Kasales, et al.
Clinical Imaging|January 9, 1998
Extended pitch thoracic helical CT 47P S Singer, K D Hopper, J A Jozefiak, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|February 27, 2001
Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CTA J Megibow, G Jacob, J P Heiken, et al.
Pageof 14

Showing results (111-120 of 134) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 14
Radiology|September 1, 1990
Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gunS H Parker, J D Lovin, W E Jobe, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 20, 2001
CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methodsK A Addis, K D Hopper, T A Iyriboz, et al.
Clinical Imaging|January 9, 1998
Utility of low mA 1.5 pitch helical versus conventional high mA abdominal CTK D Hopper, N C Keeton, C J Kasales, et al.
Investigative Radiology|December 5, 1997
Comparison of 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch abdominal helical computed tomography in evaluation of normal structures and pathologic lesionsK D Hopper, C J Kasales, R P Mahraj, et al.
Radiology|December 9, 1998
CT bronchoscopy: optimization of imaging parametersK D Hopper, T A Iyriboz, R P Mahraj, et al.
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging|January 1, 1991
The efficacy of transrectal ultrasound and prostate cancerM J Mandell, K D Hopper, M V Jarowenko, et al.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography|June 2, 1998
The optimization of helical thoracic CTK D Hopper, C J Kasales, S W Wise, et al.
Investigative Radiology|September 18, 1997
The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomographyK D Hopper, S J Huber, C J Kasales, et al.
Clinical Imaging|January 9, 1998
Extended pitch thoracic helical CT 47P S Singer, K D Hopper, J A Jozefiak, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|February 27, 2001
Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CTA J Megibow, G Jacob, J P Heiken, et al.
Pageof 14