Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

K Kerlikowske

Showing results (1-10 of 47) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs|January 1, 1997
Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefitK Kerlikowske
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|January 1, 1996
Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammographyK Kerlikowske
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)|March 1, 1996
Should we recommend screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49?L Esserman, K Kerlikowske
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs|January 1, 1997
Outcomes of modern screening mammographyK Kerlikowske, J Barclay
Lancet (London, England)|September 18, 1999
Breast screening in women aged 40-49 yearsV L Ernster, K Kerlikowske
The Western Journal of Medicine|November 9, 2000
Women should be fully informed of the potential benefits and harms before screening mammographyK Kerlikowske, V L Ernster
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|September 25, 1998
Is there a downside to elderly women undergoing screening mammography?R Smith-Bindman, K Kerlikowske
The Western Journal of Medicine|November 1, 1989
Kingella kingae endocarditis in a patient with the acquired immunodeficiency syndromeK Kerlikowske, H F Chambers
Cancer|November 1, 1995
Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years: current evidence from randomized controlled trialsK Kerlikowske, D Grady, V Ernster
The New England Journal of Medicine|January 10, 1998
Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trialsS Bent, K Kerlikowske, D Grady
Pageof 5

Showing results (1-10 of 47) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs|January 1, 1997
Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefitK Kerlikowske
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|January 1, 1996
Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammographyK Kerlikowske
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)|March 1, 1996
Should we recommend screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49?L Esserman, K Kerlikowske
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs|January 1, 1997
Outcomes of modern screening mammographyK Kerlikowske, J Barclay
Lancet (London, England)|September 18, 1999
Breast screening in women aged 40-49 yearsV L Ernster, K Kerlikowske
The Western Journal of Medicine|November 9, 2000
Women should be fully informed of the potential benefits and harms before screening mammographyK Kerlikowske, V L Ernster
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|September 25, 1998
Is there a downside to elderly women undergoing screening mammography?R Smith-Bindman, K Kerlikowske
The Western Journal of Medicine|November 1, 1989
Kingella kingae endocarditis in a patient with the acquired immunodeficiency syndromeK Kerlikowske, H F Chambers
Cancer|November 1, 1995
Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years: current evidence from randomized controlled trialsK Kerlikowske, D Grady, V Ernster
The New England Journal of Medicine|January 10, 1998
Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trialsS Bent, K Kerlikowske, D Grady
Pageof 5