Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Karsten J Jørgensen

Showing results (1-10 of 9) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Journal of Women'S Health (2002)|October 27, 2015
Four Principles to Consider Before Advising Women on Screening MammographyJohn D Keen, Karsten J Jørgensen
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej|March 25, 2010
The benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screeningJohn Brodersen, Karsten J Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche
Ugeskrift for Laeger|December 19, 2009
[A new scientific source of bias: SILLY bias. Analysis of citations of BMJ's Christmas articles]Ulrik A Felding, Karsten J Jørgensen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Trials|March 18, 2006
Flaws in design, analysis and interpretation of Pfizer's antifungal trials of voriconazole and uncritical subsequent quotationsKarsten J Jørgensen, Helle Krogh Johansen, Peter C Gøtzsche
BMC Women'S Health|December 24, 2009
Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative studyKarsten J Jørgensen, Per-Henrik Zahl, Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 18, 2013
Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature reviewBruno Heleno, Maria F Thomsen, David S Rodrigues, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|December 6, 2008
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocolsAn-Wen Chan, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Karsten J Jørgensen, et al.
BMC Medical Ethics|August 29, 2021
Are investigators' access to trial data and rights to publish restricted and are potential trial participants informed about this? A comparison of trial protocols and informed consent materialsAsger S Paludan-Müller, Michelle C Ogden, Mikkel Marquardsen, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|December 10, 2020
Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic reviewCamilla H Nejstgaard, Lisa Bero, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 9) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Journal of Women'S Health (2002)|October 27, 2015
Four Principles to Consider Before Advising Women on Screening MammographyJohn D Keen, Karsten J Jørgensen
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej|March 25, 2010
The benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screeningJohn Brodersen, Karsten J Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche
Ugeskrift for Laeger|December 19, 2009
[A new scientific source of bias: SILLY bias. Analysis of citations of BMJ's Christmas articles]Ulrik A Felding, Karsten J Jørgensen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Trials|March 18, 2006
Flaws in design, analysis and interpretation of Pfizer's antifungal trials of voriconazole and uncritical subsequent quotationsKarsten J Jørgensen, Helle Krogh Johansen, Peter C Gøtzsche
BMC Women'S Health|December 24, 2009
Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative studyKarsten J Jørgensen, Per-Henrik Zahl, Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 18, 2013
Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature reviewBruno Heleno, Maria F Thomsen, David S Rodrigues, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|December 6, 2008
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocolsAn-Wen Chan, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Karsten J Jørgensen, et al.
BMC Medical Ethics|August 29, 2021
Are investigators' access to trial data and rights to publish restricted and are potential trial participants informed about this? A comparison of trial protocols and informed consent materialsAsger S Paludan-Müller, Michelle C Ogden, Mikkel Marquardsen, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|December 10, 2020
Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic reviewCamilla H Nejstgaard, Lisa Bero, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, et al.
Pageof 1