Showing results (31-40 of 351) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 36
JAMA|July 3, 1996
Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammographyK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
JAMA|July 3, 1996
Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretationK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|February 6, 2004
Changes in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy after the publication of clinical trial resultsJennifer S Haas, Celia P Kaplan, Eric P Gerstenberger, et al.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics|August 12, 2008
High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancerCatherine C Park, James Rembert, Karen Chew, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|January 1, 1997
Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancerK Kerlikowske, J Barclay, D Grady, et al.
JAMA|March 27, 1996
Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastV L Ernster, J Barclay, K Kerlikowske, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|November 11, 2009
Rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia have declined with less use of postmenopausal hormone treatment: findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance ConsortiumTehillah S Menes, Karla Kerlikowske, Shabnam Jaffer, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|January 13, 2016
Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry DataHeidi D Nelson, Ellen S O'Meara, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.
Archives of Internal Medicine|April 13, 2000
Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results programV L Ernster, J Barclay, K Kerlikowske, et al.
Radiology|January 24, 2009
Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variablesAruna Venkatesan, Philip Chu, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.
Pageof 36