Showing results (81-90 of 351) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 36
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|May 5, 2010
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 yearsBonnie C Yankaskas, Sebastien Haneuse, Julie M Kapp, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|January 2, 2017
Risk Factors That Increase Risk of Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast CancerKarla Kerlikowske, Charlotte C Gard, Jeffrey A Tice, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|June 8, 2013
Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancerJeffrey A Tice, Ellen S O'Meara, Donald L Weaver, et al.
Cancer|May 7, 2020
New mammography screening performance metrics based on the entire screening episodeBrian L Sprague, Diana L Miglioretti, Christoph I Lee, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|December 31, 2011
Clinical and biomarker predictors of side effects from tamoxifenWendy Lorizio, Alan H B Wu, Mary S Beattie, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 5, 1998
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 22, 2015
Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated With Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography for Screen-Detected and Interval CancersLouise M Henderson, Diana L Miglioretti, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|August 19, 2015
Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast CancerJeffrey A Tice, Diana L Miglioretti, Chin-Shang Li, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|May 15, 2013
High mammographic density in women of Ashkenazi Jewish descentJennifer L Caswell, Karla Kerlikowske, John A Shepherd, et al.
Journal of Women'S Health (2002)|February 2, 2026
Assessing Preparedness of Primary Care Physicians to Discuss the Breast Biopsy Process and Results after Abnormal Mammograms: A Cross-Sectional SurveyKarly A Murphy, Jennifer Livaudais-Toman, Celia P Kaplan, et al.
Pageof 36