Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Kerry M Dwan

Showing results (1-10 of 6) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|August 23, 2017
Do systematic reviews still exclude studies with "no relevant outcome data"?Kerry M Dwan, Paula R Williamson, Jamie J Kirkham
Plos One|June 18, 2016
How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics CommitteeJamie J Kirkham, Kerry M Dwan, Anette Blümle, et al.
BMJ Open|July 14, 2019
Protocol for the development of the STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies (STROPS) guideline: checklist of items for reporting pharmacogenetic studiesMarty Richardson, Jamie J Kirkham, Kerry M Dwan, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 30, 2018
Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviewsJamie J Kirkham, Douglas G Altman, An-Wen Chan, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|February 17, 2010
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviewsJamie J Kirkham, Kerry M Dwan, Douglas G Altman, et al.
Critical Care Medicine|December 31, 2008
The clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic reviewJuliet C Hockenhull, Kerry M Dwan, Godfrey W Smith, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 6) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|August 23, 2017
Do systematic reviews still exclude studies with "no relevant outcome data"?Kerry M Dwan, Paula R Williamson, Jamie J Kirkham
Plos One|June 18, 2016
How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics CommitteeJamie J Kirkham, Kerry M Dwan, Anette Blümle, et al.
BMJ Open|July 14, 2019
Protocol for the development of the STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies (STROPS) guideline: checklist of items for reporting pharmacogenetic studiesMarty Richardson, Jamie J Kirkham, Kerry M Dwan, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 30, 2018
Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviewsJamie J Kirkham, Douglas G Altman, An-Wen Chan, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|February 17, 2010
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviewsJamie J Kirkham, Kerry M Dwan, Douglas G Altman, et al.
Critical Care Medicine|December 31, 2008
The clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic reviewJuliet C Hockenhull, Kerry M Dwan, Godfrey W Smith, et al.
Pageof 1